These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25750629)

  • 21. Contextual Modulation of Emotional Distraction: Attentional Capture and Motivational Significance.
    Micucci A; Ferrari V; De Cesarei A; Codispoti M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):621-633. PubMed ID: 31765599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.
    Seiss E; Driver J; Eimer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 19410504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Salience detection and attentional capture.
    Schubö A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.
    Demeter E; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 28(7):935-47. PubMed ID: 26967946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduction of emotional distraction during target processing by attentional manipulations.
    de Haro V; Lupiáñez J; Grimshaw GM; Martín-Arévalo E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103068. PubMed ID: 32360791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1423-33. PubMed ID: 18303979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional processing of multiple targets and distractors.
    Munneke J; Fait E; Mazza V
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1104-8. PubMed ID: 23902254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contingent capture of involuntary visual attention interferes with detection of auditory stimuli.
    Kamke MR; Harris J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():528. PubMed ID: 24920945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
    Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is perceptual learning always better at task-relevant locations? It depends on the distractors.
    Singhal I; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):992-1003. PubMed ID: 35217980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task-irrelevant filler items alter the dynamics of electrical brain activity during visual search.
    Drisdelle BL; Corriveau I; Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicoeur P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1245-1263. PubMed ID: 35899896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.
    Couperus JW; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1359():155-77. PubMed ID: 20807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Event-related potential patterns of selective attention modulated by perceptual load.
    Chen Z; Qin Y; Peng M; Zhao W; Shi X; Lai D; Yin E; Yan Y; Yao D; Liu T
    Brain Behav; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e2907. PubMed ID: 36786695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence for the attention capture and suppression failure of irrelevant singleton in test anxiety.
    Hu C; Song J; Hong Y; Zhou R
    J Psychiatr Res; 2023 May; 161():386-392. PubMed ID: 37015159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of task-irrelevant or filler items on brain mechanisms of visual spatial attention.
    Drisdelle BL; Corriveau I; Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13644. PubMed ID: 32710667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.