These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25750915)

  • 21. The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension.
    Fine AB; Jaeger TF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1362-76. PubMed ID: 26962961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aging and syntactic representations: Evidence of preserved syntactic priming and lexical boost.
    Hardy SM; Messenger K; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Sep; 32(6):588-596. PubMed ID: 28891670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The comprehension of anomalous sentences: evidence from structural priming.
    Ivanova I; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP; McLean JF; Costa A
    Cognition; 2012 Feb; 122(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 22104490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting the unbeaten path through syntactic priming.
    Arai M; Nakamura C; Mazuka R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):482-500. PubMed ID: 25528094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The development of abstract syntax: evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost.
    Rowland CF; Chang F; Ambridge B; Pine JM; Lieven EV
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 22986018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Verb Overlap on Structural Priming in Dialogue: Implications for Syntactic Learning in Aphasia.
    Man G; Meehan S; Martin N; Branigan H; Lee J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1933-1950. PubMed ID: 31112446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Verb Bias and Syntactic Ambiguity on Reading in People with Aphasia.
    Dede G
    Aphasiology; 2013 Oct; 27(10-12):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 24683286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contrasting mechanistic accounts of the lexical boost.
    Tooley KM
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):815-838. PubMed ID: 32026259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When the independence of syntactic representation meets the sentence processing of Mandarin: Evidence from syntactic priming.
    Xiang K; Chang H; Sun L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1041-1055. PubMed ID: 34428953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of lexical priming on sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
    Newman SD; Ratliff K; Muratore T; Burns T
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1285():99-108. PubMed ID: 19538948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ
    J Mem Lang; 2018 Feb; 98():59-76. PubMed ID: 29379224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: lexical priming, parsing, and syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Novick JM; Kim A; Trueswell JC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 Jan; 32(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12647563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.
    Kohen F; Milsark G; Martin N
    Aphasiology; 2011; 25(6-7):736-747. PubMed ID: 28133406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.
    Speer SR; Kjelgaard MM; Dobroth KM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Mar; 25(2):249-71. PubMed ID: 8667298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish.
    Demestre J; García-Albea JE
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 14959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Building syntactic structures in speaking: a bilingual exploration.
    Meijer PJ; Tree JE
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(3):184-95. PubMed ID: 12874987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production - an online study.
    Smith M; Wheeldon L
    Cognition; 2001 Feb; 78(2):123-64. PubMed ID: 11074248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Multiple-Channel Model of Task-Dependent Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Comprehension.
    Logačev P; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 25823920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No Morphological Markers, No Problem: ERP Study Reveals Semantic Contribution to Distinct Neural Substrates Between Noun and Verb Processing in Online Sentence Comprehension.
    Feng J; Gong T; Shuai L; Wu Y
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():957. PubMed ID: 31551705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.