213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25751041)
1. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
Hoffman P; Woollams AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.
Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
Li J; Joanisse MF
Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.
Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M
Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.
Durkin K; Manning J
J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
Jager B; Cleland AA
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
Syssau A; Laxén J
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.
Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of semantic diversity and word frequency on single word processing.
Chapman CA; Martin RC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1035-1068. PubMed ID: 34914412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
Marelli M; Amenta S
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.
Beretta A; Fiorentino R; Poeppel D
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15922158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semantic effects in single-word naming.
Strain E; Patterson K; Seidenberg MS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1140-54. PubMed ID: 8744959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic diversity is best measured with unscaled vectors: Reply to Cevoli, Watkins and Rastle (2020).
Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1688-1700. PubMed ID: 34591284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lexico-semantic effects on word naming in Persian: does age of acquisition have an effect?
Bakhtiar M; Weekes B
Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):298-313. PubMed ID: 25324046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
