These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25751041)

  • 21. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
    Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition.
    Smolka E; Eulitz C
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes.
    Lopukhina A; Laurinavichyute A; Lopukhin K; Dragoy O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():192. PubMed ID: 29515502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Beginning readers activate semantics from sub-word orthography.
    Nation K; Cocksey J
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 19108820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task.
    Luo CR; Johnson RA; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):833-43. PubMed ID: 9701974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What is semantic diversity and why does it facilitate visual word recognition?
    Cevoli B; Watkins C; Rastle K
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):247-263. PubMed ID: 32666392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon.
    Klepousniotou E
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):205-23. PubMed ID: 12081393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.
    Eddington CM; Tokowicz N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 24889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Redesigning the exploration of semantic dynamics: SSD account in light of regression design.
    Mišić K; Filipović Đurđević D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1155-1170. PubMed ID: 34507507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diversity of narrative context disrupts the early stage of learning the meanings of novel words.
    Hulme RC; Begum A; Nation K; Rodd JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2338-2350. PubMed ID: 37369974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity.
    Fernandino L; Conant LL
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Aug; 201():108939. PubMed ID: 38897450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing.
    McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
    Lang Speech; 2001 Sep; 44(Pt 3):295-323. PubMed ID: 11814216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults.
    Peleg O; Ben-Hur G; Segal O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2334-2344. PubMed ID: 32603647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task.
    Barber HA; Otten LJ; Kousta ST; Vigliocco G
    Brain Lang; 2013 Apr; 125(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23454073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of item-level contextual history on lexical and semantic judgments by children and adults.
    Hsiao Y; Bird M; Norris H; Pagán A; Nation K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2367-2383. PubMed ID: 31829649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.