358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25751646)
1. G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.
Antar A; Otrock ZK; Kharfan-Dabaja MA; Ghaddara HA; Kreidieh N; Mahfouz R; Bazarbachi A
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2015 Jun; 50(6):813-7. PubMed ID: 25751646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.
Chaudhary L; Awan F; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Tse W; Craig M; Hamadani M
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 23765597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.
Awan F; Kochuparambil ST; Falconer DE; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Deremer D; Jillella A; Craig M; Hamadani M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 48(10):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23584435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.
Nademanee AP; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; Stadtmauer EA; Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; Hsu FJ; Bridger G; Bolwell BJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Oct; 18(10):1564-72. PubMed ID: 22683613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.
Afifi S; Adel NG; Devlin S; Duck E; Vanak J; Landau H; Chung DJ; Lendvai N; Lesokhin A; Korde N; Reich L; Landgren O; Giralt S; Hassoun H
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2016 Apr; 51(4):546-52. PubMed ID: 26726942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost analysis of a randomized stem cell mobilization study in multiple myeloma.
Varmavuo V; Silvennoinen R; Anttila P; Säily M; Sankelo M; Putkonen M; Ahonen J; Mahlamäki E; Mäntymaa P; Savolainen ER; Remes K; Jantunen E
Ann Hematol; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1653-9. PubMed ID: 27485453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.
Milone G; Martino M; Spadaro A; Leotta S; Di Marco A; Scalzulli P; Cupri A; Di Martina V; Schinocca E; Spina E; Tripepi G
Br J Haematol; 2014 Jan; 164(1):113-23. PubMed ID: 24138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pegfilgrastim- versus filgrastim-based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: efficacy and cost analysis.
Costa LJ; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Butcher CD; Littleton AL; Shoptaw KB; Kang Y; Stuart RK
Transfusion; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2375-81. PubMed ID: 22404694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Plerixafor Added to a Mobilization Regimen of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Collection.
Cashen AF; Rettig M; Gao F; Smith A; Abboud C; Stockerl-Goldstein K; Vij R; Uy G; Westervelt P; DiPersio J
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2017 Aug; 23(8):1282-1289. PubMed ID: 28476490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.
Veltri L; Cumpston A; Shillingburg A; Wen S; Luo J; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Craig M; Hamadani M; Kanate AS
Cytotherapy; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1785-92. PubMed ID: 26475754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Plerixafor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: the Austrian experience on a named patient program.
Worel N; Rosskopf K; Neumeister P; Kasparu H; Nachbaur D; Russ G; Namberger K; Witt V; Schloegl E; Zojer N; Linkesch W; Kalhs P; Greinix HT
Transfusion; 2011 May; 51(5):968-75. PubMed ID: 20880037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.
Tichopád A; Vítová V; Kořístek Z; Lysák D
J Clin Apher; 2013 Dec; 28(6):395-403. PubMed ID: 23922227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CD34+ cell subclasses and lymphocyte subsets in blood grafts collected after various mobilization methods in myeloma patients.
Varmavuo V; Mäntymaa P; Silvennoinen R; Nousiainen T; Kuittinen T; Jantunen E
Transfusion; 2013 May; 53(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 22897584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.
Li J; Hamilton E; Vaughn L; Graiser M; Renfroe H; Lechowicz MJ; Langston A; Prichard JM; Anderson D; Gleason C; Lonial S; Flowers CR; Kaufman JL; Waller EK
Transfusion; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2175-82. PubMed ID: 21492180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost and clinical analysis of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor compared to G-CSF and cyclophosphamide.
Shaughnessy P; Islas-Ohlmayer M; Murphy J; Hougham M; MacPherson J; Winkler K; Silva M; Steinberg M; Matous J; Selvey S; Maris M; McSweeney PA
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2011 May; 17(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20813198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patients' outcome after rescue plerixafor administration for autologous stem cell mobilization: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Spoerl S; Peter R; Wäscher D; Götze K; Verbeek M; Peschel C; Krackhardt AM
Transfusion; 2017 Jan; 57(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 27859332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Intermediate-High-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone for Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Zannetti BA; Saraceni F; Cellini C; Fabbri E; Monaco F; Guarini A; Laszlo D; Martino M; Olivieri A; Imola M; Tosi P; Chiarucci M; Zuffa E; Lanza F
Transplant Cell Ther; 2021 Mar; 27(3):244.e1-244.e8. PubMed ID: 33781522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rescue stem cell mobilization with plerixafor economizes leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hundemer M; Engelhardt M; Bruckner T; Kraeker S; Schmitt A; Sauer S; Neben K; Witzens-Harig M; Goldschmidt H; Ho AD; Wuchter P
J Clin Apher; 2014 Dec; 29(6):299-304. PubMed ID: 24771277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
