BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25752374)

  • 1. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy on wound infection in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.
    Guo D; Liao F; Yang L; Liu B; Chen L
    Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14598. PubMed ID: 38272810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges.
    Shewale JB; Correa AM; Baker CM; Villafane-Ferriol N; Hofstetter WL; Jordan VS; Kehlet H; Lewis KM; Mehran RJ; Summers BL; Schaub D; Wilks SA; Swisher SG;
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jun; 261(6):1114-23. PubMed ID: 25243545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.
    Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Abma I; Belgers EHJ; Coene PLO; Dekker JWT; van Duijvendijk P; Emous M; Gisbertz SS; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; van Sandick JW; van der Sluis PC; van Det MJ; van Esser S; Law S; de Steur WO; Sosef MN; Wijnhoven B; Hannink G; Rosman C; van Workum F;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e246556. PubMed ID: 38639938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Miao Y; Nie X; He WW; Luo CY; Xia Y; Zhou AR; Wei SR; Wang CH; Fang Q; Peng L; Leng XF; Han YT; Luo L; Xie Q
    Support Care Cancer; 2024 Mar; 32(4):237. PubMed ID: 38509239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical outcomes and survival following esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma with or without liver cirrhosis: retrospective cohort study.
    Park SY; Shin J; Jeon YJ; Lee J; Cho JH; Kim HK; Choi YS; Zo JI; Shim YM
    Int J Surg; 2024 May; 110(5):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 38349217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbon dioxide gas-induced pneumothorax versus one-lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multicenter propensity score matching cohort study.
    Chen J; Heng J; Zheng B; Zeng T; Wang H; Wang P; Lin Y; Gao W; Chen C; Tan L; Fu J
    Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; 110(3):1376-1382. PubMed ID: 38051934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of operative time on textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy, a risk-adjusted analysis from a high-volume center.
    Yang Y; Jiang C; Liu Z; Zhu K; Yu B; Yuan C; Qi C; Li Z
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3195-3203. PubMed ID: 38632118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Eddahchouri Y; Cheong E; Cuesta MA; van Daele E; Ferri LE; Gisbertz SS; Gutschow CA; Hubka M; Hölscher AH; Law S; Luyer MDP; Merritt RE; Morse CR; Mueller CL; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Nilsson M; Pattyn P; Shen Y; van den Wildenberg FJH; Abma IL; Rosman C; van Workum F
    JAMA Surg; 2024 Mar; 159(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 38150247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asian Americans have higher 30-day surgical complications after esophagectomy: A propensity-score matched study from ACS-NSQIP database.
    Li R; Luo Q; Gutierrez ID
    Am J Surg; 2024 Jun; 232():75-80. PubMed ID: 38199873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Outcomes of Preserving Bronchial Arteries During Radical Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.
    Fujisawa K; Ohkura Y; Ueno M; Ogawa Y; Shimoyama H; Haruta S; Udagawa H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):827-837. PubMed ID: 37882931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Ofuchi T; Iwatsuki M; Matsumoto C; Toihata T; Kosumi K; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Yoshida N; Baba H
    Surg Today; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38771326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esophagectomies for Malignancy Among General and Thoracic Surgeons: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis Stratified by Surgical Approach.
    Leonard-Murali S; Ivanics T; Nasser H; Tang A; Hammoud Z
    Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4891-4894. PubMed ID: 34382445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Esophagectomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Initiative Results in Improved Outcomes.
    Sims CR; Abou Chaar MK; Kerfeld MH; Cassivi SD; Hofer RE; Nichols FC; Reisenauer J; Saddoughi SS; Shen KR; Stewart TM; Tapias LF; Wigle DA; Blackmon SH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2024 Apr; 117(4):847-857. PubMed ID: 38043851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An esophagectomy surgical Apgar score-based nomogram-a risk-based postoperative triage system: a phase II randomised trial.
    Chen X; Xi Y; Lin C; Yu H; Kim JY; Wee JO; He X; Gao J; Shen W
    J Thorac Dis; 2024 Apr; 16(4):2550-2562. PubMed ID: 38738231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of preoperative single-dose dexamethasone in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.
    Li X; Yu L; Yang J; Fu M; Tan H
    Perioper Med (Lond); 2024 May; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 38807202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex-related differences in oncologic outcomes, operative complications and health-related quality of life after curative-intent oesophageal cancer treatment: multicentre retrospective analysis.
    Mantziari S; Elliott JA; Markar SR; Klevebro F; Goense L; Johar A; Lagergren P; Zaninotto G; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Schäfer M; Nilsson M; Hanna GB; Reynolds JV;
    BJS Open; 2024 Mar; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 38568850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolonged postoperative length of stay is associated with poor overall survival after an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ma L; Li J; Shao L; Lin D; Xiang J
    J Thorac Dis; 2015 Nov; 7(11):2018-23. PubMed ID: 26716041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary on "Surgical outcomes and survival following esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma with or without liver cirrhosis: retrospective cohort study".
    Li K; Leng X; Peng L
    Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38498363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.