These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25753111)
1. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes. Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications. Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Payne TN; Dauterive FR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study. Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Essential Elements of a Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Simpson KM; Advincula AP Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Sep; 43(3):479-93. PubMed ID: 27521880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery. Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review. Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lenfant L; Canlorbe G; Belghiti J; Kreaden US; Hebert AE; Nikpayam M; Uzan C; Azaïs H J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2647-2662. PubMed ID: 37856058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]