BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25753575)

  • 1. Current concepts for the biological basis of dental implants: foreign body equilibrium and osseointegration dynamics.
    Trindade R; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2015 May; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 25753575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials: On Mechanisms for Buildup and Breakdown of Osseointegration.
    Trindade R; Albrektsson T; Tengvall P; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 25257971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reactions of cells at implant surfaces.
    van Blitterswijk CA; Bakker D; Hesseling SC; Koerten HK
    Biomaterials; 1991 Mar; 12(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 1878452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early-stage osseointegration capability of a submicrofeatured titanium surface created by microroughening and anodic oxidation.
    Yamada M; Ueno T; Minamikawa H; Ikeda T; Nakagawa K; Ogawa T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):991-1001. PubMed ID: 22726210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mineralization at the interface of implants.
    Joos U; Wiesmann HP; Szuwart T; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):783-90. PubMed ID: 16697141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving osseointegration of dental implants.
    Elias CN; Meirelles L
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Mar; 7(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 20214429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
    Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue response: biomaterials, dental implants, and compromised osseous tissue.
    Babu RS A; Ogle O
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 25835795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
    Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical and biological characteristics of implant materials.
    Keller JC
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():5-7. PubMed ID: 11276747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osseointegration: contemporary concepts and treatment.
    Caplanis N; Kan JY; Lozada JL
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1997 Dec; 25(12):843-51. PubMed ID: 9534454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegration of short titan implants: A pilot study in pigs.
    Botzenhart U; Kunert-Keil C; Heinemann F; Gredes T; Seiler J; Berniczei-Roykó Á; Gedrange T
    Ann Anat; 2015 May; 199():16-22. PubMed ID: 24780612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the influence of the macro- and microstructure of dental zirconium implants on osseointegration: a minipig study.
    Mueller CK; Solcher P; Peisker A; Mtsariashvilli M; Schlegel KA; Hildebrand G; Rost J; Liefeith K; Chen J; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 22762921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review.
    Sykaras N; Iacopino AM; Marker VA; Triplett RG; Woody RD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 11055135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Tapered Groovy implant optimizes implant success in suboptimal clinical conditions.
    Hanao G
    Dent Implantol Update; 2006 Jan; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16422445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography.
    Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Aragão FJ; Cooper LF
    Biomaterials; 2008 Oct; 29(28):3822-35. PubMed ID: 18617258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biological criteria for osseointegration].
    Mongeot M
    J Parodontol; 1989 Feb; 8(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 2632777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.