These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25753725)

  • 1. Scoring functions for AutoDock.
    Hill AD; Reilly PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1273():467-74. PubMed ID: 25753725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A New, Improved Hybrid Scoring Function for Molecular Docking and Scoring Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
    Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2016 Apr; 87(4):618-25. PubMed ID: 26643167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
    Gaillard T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 1. Compilation of the test set.
    Li Y; Liu Z; Li J; Han L; Liu J; Zhao Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1700-16. PubMed ID: 24716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. JADOPPT: java based AutoDock preparing and processing tool.
    García-Pérez C; Peláez R; Therón R; Luis López-Pérez J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):583-585. PubMed ID: 27797779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
    Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. pso@autodock: a fast flexible molecular docking program based on Swarm intelligence.
    Namasivayam V; Günther R
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Dec; 70(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17986206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
    Park H; Lee J; Lee S
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus scoring approach to identify the inhibitors of AMP-activated protein kinase α2 with virtual screening.
    Park H; Eom JW; Kim YH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2139-46. PubMed ID: 24915156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CovalentDock: automated covalent docking with parameterized covalent linkage energy estimation and molecular geometry constraints.
    Ouyang X; Zhou S; Su CT; Ge Z; Li R; Kwoh CK
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Feb; 34(4):326-36. PubMed ID: 23034731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Docking studies on DNA intercalators.
    Gilad Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting protein complex geometries with linear scoring functions.
    Demir-Kavuk O; Krull F; Chae MH; Knapp EW
    Genome Inform; 2010; 24():21-30. PubMed ID: 22081586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2149-59. PubMed ID: 21541955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions.
    Ruvinsky AM
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jun; 28(8):1364-72. PubMed ID: 17342720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking.
    Yang JM; Chen CC
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 15048822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.