These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25754139)

  • 1. Reproducibility of automated volumetric breast density assessment in short-term digital mammography reimaging.
    Ko ES; Kim RB; Han BK
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 25754139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography.
    Kim WH; Moon WK; Kim SM; Yi A; Chang JM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1724-30. PubMed ID: 23727379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volumetric breast composition analysis: reproducibility of breast percent density and fibroglandular tissue volume measurements in serial mammograms.
    Engelken F; Singh JM; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Böttcher J; Renz DM
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23878356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
    Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography.
    Mainprize JG; Tyson AH; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4660-8. PubMed ID: 22894390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
    Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraindividual comparison of two methods of volumetric breast composition assessment.
    Schmachtenberg C; Hammann-Kloss S; Bick U; Engelken F
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 25586710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jul; 65(7):708-715. PubMed ID: 38825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Computer-Assisted Breast Density Estimation: Comparison of Interactive Thresholding, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Methods.
    Kang E; Lee EJ; Jang M; Kim SM; Kim Y; Chun M; Tai JH; Han W; Kim SW; Kim JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 27187523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
    Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.
    Chen L; Ray S; Keller BM; Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 27002418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.
    Engelken F; Bremme R; Bick U; Hammann-Kloss S; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e844-8. PubMed ID: 22647420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.