437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25754527)
41. Reliability, validity and ease of use of a portable point-of-care coagulation device in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.
Lizotte A; Quessy I; Vanier MC; Martineau J; Caron S; Darveau M; Dubé A; Gilbert E; Blais N; Lalonde L
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2002 Dec; 14(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 12913406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. International normalized ratio testing with point-of-care coagulometer in healthy term neonates.
Iijima S; Baba T; Ueno D; Ohishi A
BMC Pediatr; 2014 Jul; 14():179. PubMed ID: 25008798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers.
Karon BS; McBane RD; Chaudhry R; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jul; 130(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18550476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reliability of International Normalized Ratio Results in the CoaguChek Pro II System in a Clinical Setting.
Cortina-de-la-Rosa E; Izaguirre-Ávila R; Ramírez-Hernández A; Romero-Arroyo MO; Cortés-Cortés K
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2023; 29():10760296231216451. PubMed ID: 38018118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the International Normalized Ratio Between a Point-of-Care Test and a Conventional Laboratory Test: the Latter Performs Better in Assessing Warfarin-induced Changes in Coagulation Factors.
Kim YS; Choi JW; Song SH; Hwang HY; Sohn SH; Kim JS; Kang Y; Gu JY; Kim KH; Kim HK
Ann Lab Med; 2023 Jul; 43(4):337-344. PubMed ID: 36843402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Acceptability of CoaguChek S and CoaguChek XS generated international normalised ratios against a laboratory standard in a paediatric setting.
Williams VK; Griffiths AB
Pathology; 2007 Dec; 39(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 18027261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of warfarin management with international normalized ratio self-testing and online remote monitoring and management plus low-dose vitamin k with genomic considerations: a pilot study.
Bussey HI; Bussey M; Bussey-Smith KL; Frei CR
Pharmacotherapy; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1136-46. PubMed ID: 24038412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. International normalized ratio monitoring of vitamin K antagonist therapy: comparative performance of point-of-care and laboratory-derived testing.
Bonar R; Mohammed S; Favaloro EJ
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2015 Apr; 41(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 25839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Inaccuracy of point-of-care international normalized ratio in rivaroxaban-treated patients.
Baruch L; Sherman O
Ann Pharmacother; 2013 Sep; 47(9):1210-2. PubMed ID: 24259738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparative study of accuracy and clinical agreement of the CoaguChek XS portable device versus standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients.
Torreiro EG; Fernández EG; Rodríguez RM; López CV; Núñez JB
Thromb Haemost; 2009 May; 101(5):969-74. PubMed ID: 19404552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
Braun S; Watzke H; Hasenkam JM; Schwab M; Wolf T; Dovifat C; Völler H
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of a portable international normalized ratio monitor for patients receiving a low molecular weight heparin as a bridge pending full oral anticoagulant efficacy.
Meurin P; Tabet JY; Monchi M; Weber H; Fabre C; Gibier B; Renaud N; Driss AB
Thromb Res; 2010 Feb; 125(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 19942256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. International normalized ratio testing with a point-of-care coagulometer in 1-month-old infants: A comparison with Normotest.
Iijima S; Baba T; Ueno D; Ohishi A
Thromb Res; 2016 Sep; 145():72-7. PubMed ID: 27500369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparative study between INR and the determination of prothrombin time with the Coaguchek(r) portable coagulometer in the dental treatment of anticoagulated patients.
Plaza-Costa A; Garcia-Romero P; Poveda-Roda R; Bagan JV; Silvestre-Donat FJ; Cervero JA
Med Oral; 2002; 7(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 11887020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. INR comparison between the CoaguChek S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation.
Hentrich DP; Fritschi J; Müller PR; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2007; 119(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 16765423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Validation of the international normalized ratio (INR) in a new point-of-care system designed for home monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy.
Plesch W; van den Besselaar AM
Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Feb; 31(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 19143869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Monitoring anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Isert M; Miesbach W; Schüttfort G; Weil Y; Tirneci V; Kasper A; Weber A; Lindhoff-Last E; Herrmann E; Linnemann B
Ann Hematol; 2015 Aug; 94(8):1291-9. PubMed ID: 25859986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of CoaguChek XS for point-of-care antithrombotic monitoring in children with heart disease.
Moon JR; Jeong SI; Huh J; Lee HJ; Park PW; Kang IS
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2010; 40(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 20689136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quality control of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in primary care patients in Poland: a multi-centre study.
Sawicka-Powierza J; Buczkowski K; Chlabicz S; Gugnowski Z; Powierza K; Ołtarzewska AM
Kardiol Pol; 2018; 76(4):764-769. PubMed ID: 29313558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Accuracy and precision of the CoaguChek S versus laboratory INRs in a clinic.
Havrda DE; Hawk TL; Marvin CM
Ann Pharmacother; 2002 May; 36(5):769-75. PubMed ID: 11978150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
