159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25755675)
21. Effects of neural refractoriness on spatio-temporal variability in spike initiations with Electrical stimulation.
Mino H; Rubinstein JT
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 17009486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Phenomenological Model Reproducing Temporal Response Characteristics of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.
Takanen M; Seeber BU
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221117079. PubMed ID: 36071660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finite element analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of tonotopically aligned human auditory fiber pathways: A computational environment for modeling electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant based on micro-CT.
Potrusil T; Heshmat A; Sajedi S; Wenger C; Johnson Chacko L; Glueckert R; Schrott-Fischer A; Rattay F
Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 393():108001. PubMed ID: 32535276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stochastic information transfer from cochlear implant electrodes to auditory nerve fibers.
Gao X; Grayden DB; McDonnell MD
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Aug; 90(2):022722. PubMed ID: 25215773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.
Frijns JH; de Snoo SL; ten Kate JH
Hear Res; 1996 May; 95(1-2):33-48. PubMed ID: 8793506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Placement on the Current Spread in the Cochlea.
Schafer F; Enke J; Bohnke F; Hemmert W; Bai S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():6145-6148. PubMed ID: 30441737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Renewal-process approximation of a stochastic threshold model for electrical neural stimulation.
Bruce IC; Irlicht LS; White MW; O'Leary SJ; Clark GM
J Comput Neurosci; 2000; 9(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 11030517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. model development at low pulse rates: general model and application to individuals.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):15-30. PubMed ID: 19110049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of a purely conductance-based stochastic nerve fibre model as applied to compound models of populations of human auditory nerve fibres used in cochlear implant simulations.
Badenhorst W; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Biol Cybern; 2017 Dec; 111(5-6):439-458. PubMed ID: 29063191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.
Hanekom T
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Jan; 43(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15742719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.
Frijns JH; de Snoo SL; Schoonhoven R
Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):170-86. PubMed ID: 8567435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards a Complete In Silico Assessment of the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation Surgery.
Mangado N; Ceresa M; Benav H; Mistrik P; Piella G; González Ballester MA
Mol Neurobiol; 2018 Jan; 55(1):173-186. PubMed ID: 28840488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array.
Heshmat A; Sajedi S; Schrott-Fischer A; Rattay F
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():751599. PubMed ID: 34955717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
Goldwyn JH; Rubinstein JT; Shea-Brown E
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Sep; 108(5):1430-52. PubMed ID: 22673331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
