167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25755793)
21. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Zucchi A; Lazzeri M; Porena M; Mearini L; Costantini E
Nat Rev Urol; 2010 Nov; 7(11):626-33. PubMed ID: 21068763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Protocol for a prospective multisite cohort study investigating hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: the HUPPS study.
Scime NV; Ramage K; Brennand EA;
BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e053679. PubMed ID: 34607873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The incidence of transfusion and associated risk factors in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Pandya LK; Lynch CD; Hundley AF; Nekkanti S; Hudson CO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 28709582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift™ mesh.
Huang LY; Chu LC; Chiang HJ; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25600353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Duan L; Zhang YH; Niu K; Wang WY; Qin L; Zhang XL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery is superior to vaginal reconstruction in the pelvic organ prolapse.
Park YH; Yang SC; Park ST; Park SH; Kim HB
Int J Med Sci; 2014; 11(11):1082-8. PubMed ID: 25170290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Uterine preserving technique in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: Laparoscopic pectopexy.
Salman S; Kumbasar S; Yeniocak AS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Mar; 48(3):850-856. PubMed ID: 35001452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Laparoscopic Y-shaped polypropylene mesh for uterine and vaginal vault prolapse].
Li M; Feng Y; Jin S; Yu D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1106-9. PubMed ID: 24279025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Uterus-Sparing Surgery: Outcomes of Transvaginal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy.
Aserlind A; Garcia AN; Medina CA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32387566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of preoperative vaginal estrogen therapy for the incidence of mesh complication after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in postmenopausal women: is it helpful or a myth? A 1-year randomized controlled trial.
Sun Z; Zhu L; Xu T; Shi X; Lang J
Menopause; 2016 Jul; 23(7):740-8. PubMed ID: 27163518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Position of Ibero-American Society of Neurourology and UroGynecology (SINUG) on the use of vaginal meshes in pelvic organ prolapse.
Martín-Martínez A; Müller-Arteaga C; Blasco-Hernández P; Padilla-Fernández B; Martínez-García R; Errando-Smet C; Vicente-Palacio E; Cruz F; Castro-Díaz D; López-Fando L; Ros-Cerro C; Arlandis-Guzmán S; Espuña-Pons M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Mar; 39(3):1020-1025. PubMed ID: 32068303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Forde JC; Chughtai B; Anger JT; Mao J; Sedrakyan A
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 28091710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Method and significance of ultrasonographic assessment of the uterine weight before pelvic floor reconstruction].
Ma N; Jiang L; Wu Y; Huang L; Fan S; Chen L; Song Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 49(6):437-40. PubMed ID: 25169636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Unexpected Significant Uterine Pathological Findings at Vaginal Hysterectomy Despite Unremarkable Preoperative Workup.
Mizrachi Y; Tannus S; Bar J; Sagiv R; Levy T; Condrea A; Ginath S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2017 Oct; 19(10):631-634. PubMed ID: 29103241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prophylactic midurethral sling insertion during transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery for advanced prolapse patients with high-risk predictors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence.
Lo TS; Chua S; Kao CC; Hsieh WC; Wu MP; Tseng LH
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1541-1549. PubMed ID: 30338371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Gender expression is associated with selection of uterine preservation or hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Novel methodology for sex- and gender-based analysis in gynecologic research.
Cummings S; Ramage K; Scime NV; Ahmed SB; Brennand EA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 159(2):522-529. PubMed ID: 35262193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
