These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25758175)
21. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate? Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge. Tiede HL; Leboe JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning? Tauber SK; Witherby AE Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):836-847. PubMed ID: 31259565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval. Tullis JG; Benjamin AS Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Beginning at the beginning: Recall order and the number of words to be recalled. Tan L; Ward G; Paulauskaite L; Markou M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1282-92. PubMed ID: 26844583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning. Undorf M; Zander T Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27815819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Why is knowledge updating after task experience incomplete? Contributions of encoding experience, scaling artifact, and inferential deficit. Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Tauber SK Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 25326151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs. Witherby AE; Tauber SK Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs). Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Category labels can influence the effects of selective retrieval on nonretrieved items. Wirth M; Bäuml KT Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):481-493. PubMed ID: 32157639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring. Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall. Hourihan KL; Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 27527533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adult age differences in the temporal characteristics of category free recall. Wingtield A; Lindfield KC; Kahana MJ Psychol Aging; 1998 Jun; 13(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 9640586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Part-set cuing effects in younger and older adults. Marsh EJ; Dolan PO; Balota DA; Roediger HL Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 15065937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering. Murphy DH; Huckins SC; Rhodes MG; Castel AD Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):910-921. PubMed ID: 34846689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects? Pyc MA; Rawson KA Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]