These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25758176)

  • 21. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transfer of an implied incompatible spatial mapping to a Simon task.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():81-9. PubMed ID: 26745369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction.
    Theeuwes M; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1470-1480. PubMed ID: 24884648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the temporal dynamics of spatial stimulus-response transfer between spatial incompatibility and Simon tasks.
    Ivanoff J; Blagdon R; Feener S; McNeil M; Muir PH
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():243. PubMed ID: 25191217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 12035890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transfer of location-specific control to untrained locations.
    Weidler BJ; Bugg JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2202-17. PubMed ID: 26800157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of dimensional overlap on location-related priming in the Simon task.
    Lehle C; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2329-47. PubMed ID: 23581810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attention is required for acquisition but not expression of new response biases.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1554-60. PubMed ID: 20822305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Foster HE; Ashe J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Jan; 7(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 9838139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Practice effects vs. transfer effects in the Simon task.
    D'Ascenzo S; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 32770264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of prior practice on the stimulus-response compatibility effect in a mixed mapping environment.
    Creekmur B; Vu KP
    Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 22953692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.