253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25758543)
41. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions before and after contrast enhancement.
Janka R; Hammon M; Geppert C; Nothhelfer A; Uder M; Wenkel E
Rofo; 2014 Feb; 186(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 23929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Simultaneous segmentation and iterative registration method for computing ADC with reduced artifacts from DW-MRI.
Veeraraghavan H; Do RK; Reidy DL; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2249-60. PubMed ID: 25979019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment.
Belli P; Costantini M; Ierardi C; Bufi E; Amato D; Mule' A; Nardone L; Terribile D; Bonomo L
Breast J; 2011; 17(6):610-9. PubMed ID: 21929557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of gadoxetic acid on quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver.
Colagrande S; Mazzoni LN; Mazzoni E; Pradella S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 23239165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Accuracy of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI with background signal suppression (MR-DWIBS) in diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Xu L; Tian J; Liu Y; Li C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 24923480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Apparent diffusion coefficient of uterine leiomyoma as a predictor of the potential response to uterine artery embolization.
Lee MS; Kim MD; Jung DC; Lee M; Won JY; Park SI; Lee DY; Lee KH
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1361-5. PubMed ID: 23891046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems.
Keenan KE; Peskin AP; Wilmes LJ; Aliu SO; Jones EF; Li W; Kornak J; Newitt DC; Hylton NM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):846-55. PubMed ID: 27008431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index.
Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Ishida T; Watanabe G; Tada H; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25203132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Diffusion-weighted imaging with fat suppression using short-tau inversion recovery: Clinical utility for diagnosis of breast lesions.
Ouyang Z; Ouyang Y; Zhu M; Lu Y; Zhang Z; Shi J; Li X; Ren G
Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug; 69(8):e337-44. PubMed ID: 24837698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions.
Caivano R; Villonio A; D' Antuono F; Gioioso M; Rabasco P; Iannelli G; Zandolino A; Lotumolo A; Dinardo G; Macarini L; Guglielmi G; Cammarota A
Cancer Invest; 2015 May; 33(5):159-64. PubMed ID: 25831024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the pancreas, pancreas carcinoma, and mass-forming focal pancreatitis.
Wiggermann P; Grützmann R; Weissenböck A; Kamusella P; Dittert DD; Stroszczynski C
Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 22262868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. High-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Singer L; Wilmes LJ; Saritas EU; Shankaranarayanan A; Proctor E; Wisner DJ; Chang B; Joe BN; Nishimura DG; Hylton NM
Acad Radiol; 2012 May; 19(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 22197382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability.
Yoshida T; Urikura A; Hosokawa Y; Shirata K; Nakaya Y; Endo M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Jun; 14(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 33725272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of b1000 and b2000 image sets for index lesion detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Hindman N; Lim RP; Das K; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Taneja SS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23371846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Malignant Breast Masses.
Jang M; Kim SM; Yun BL; Ahn HS; Kim SY; Kang E; Kim SW
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1689-97. PubMed ID: 26539016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
