1196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25758990)
1. Live birth rates using conventional in vitro fertilization compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved.
Sfontouris IA; Kolibianakis EM; Lainas GT; Navaratnarajah R; Tarlatzis BC; Lainas TG
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 May; 32(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 25758990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age.
Tannus S; Son WY; Gilman A; Younes G; Shavit T; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 27852688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of clinical outcomes between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in poor responders with only single oocyte retrieved.
Wu CY; Huang TJ; Hwu YM; Kuo-Kuang Lee R; Lin MH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):55-58. PubMed ID: 36720551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of IVF/ICSI-FET Outcomes in Women With Advanced Endometriosis: Influence on Ovarian Response and Oocyte Competence.
Li A; Zhang J; Kuang Y; Yu C
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():427. PubMed ID: 32765424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): which is preferred for advanced age patients with five or fewer oocytes retrieved?
Liu H; Zhao H; Yu G; Li M; Ma S; Zhang H; Wu K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 29417282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on clinical effect on infertility women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated by in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].
Yu R; Lin J; Zhao JZ; Wang PY; Xiao SQ; Zhang W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 22781109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted oocyte activation is not beneficial for all patients with a suspected oocyte-related activation deficiency.
Vanden Meerschaut F; Nikiforaki D; De Gheselle S; Dullaerts V; Van den Abbeel E; Gerris J; Heindryckx B; De Sutter P
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jul; 27(7):1977-84. PubMed ID: 22493027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.
Li Z; Wang AY; Bowman M; Hammarberg K; Farquhar C; Johnson L; Safi N; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 29897449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocytes retrieved].
Tan H; Chen L; He L; Quan S
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Feb; 32(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 22381770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgically retrieved spermatozoa versus ejaculated spermatozoa in modified natural IVF-ICSI cycles.
Jamal W; Vélez MP; Zini A; Phillips S; Hemmings R; Kadoch IJ
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Sep; 25(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 22818097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional IVF revisited: Is ICSI better for non-male factor infertility? Randomized controlled double blind study.
Isikoglu M; Avci A; Kendirci Ceviren A; Aydınuraz B; Ata B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Sep; 50(7):101990. PubMed ID: 33221561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [In vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for primary and secondary infertility using sibling oocytes: clinical analysis of the outcomes].
Shi XY; Wu FR; Chen SL; Wang QL; Luo C; Ni YP; Zheng HY; Qiu ZL; Zhang WQ; Yang J; Chen X
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Oct; 30(10):2263-6. PubMed ID: 20965820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can intracytoplasmic sperm injection prevent total fertilization failure and enhance embryo quality in patients with non-male factor infertility?
Kim JY; Kim JH; Jee BC; Lee JR; Suh CS; Kim SH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():188-91. PubMed ID: 24793928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen.
Staessen C; Camus M; Clasen K; De Vos A; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 1999 Oct; 14(10):2474-9. PubMed ID: 10527972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes.
van der Westerlaken L; Naaktgeboren N; Verburg H; Dieben S; Helmerhorst FM
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 16595217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].
Ye H; Huang GN; Cao YX; Zhong Y; Huang YH; Zhu GJ; Zhou LM; Chen ZJ; Shi JZ; Zeng Y; Weng N; Huang XF; Yang J; Zhu YM; Li YP; Yi D; Zhuang GL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 48(11):838-42. PubMed ID: 24444561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increased fertilization and good-quality embryo formation in patients with non-male factor indications for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized study.
Khamsi F; Yavas Y; Roberge S; Wong JC; Lacanna IC; Endman M
Fertil Steril; 2001 Feb; 75(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 11172837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection does not improve the outcome of IVF treatments in patients with advanced maternal age or low oocyte number: A randomized controlled trial.
Fancsovits P; Lehner A; Kaszas Z; Nemes A; Dudas B; Joo K; Murber A; Berkes-Bara E; Fekecs G; Urbancsek J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Oct; 52(8):102625. PubMed ID: 37348787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with "genuine" poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Kedem A; Tsur A; Haas J; Yerushalmi GM; Hourvitz A; Machtinger R; Orvieto R
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1624-8. PubMed ID: 24680364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
