152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25759305)
1. Validation of the new FIGO staging system (2009) for vulvar cancer in the Chinese population.
Li J; Cai Y; Ke G; Xiang L; Wang L; Yang W; Wu X; Yang H
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 25759305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance and prognostic value of femoral lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage III vulvar carcinoma.
Tu H; Sun P; Gu HF; Zhang XK; Huang H; Wan T; Liu JH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1768-1775. PubMed ID: 28602173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic impact of reduced tumor-free margin distance on long-term survival in FIGO stage IB/II vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.
Micheletti L; Preti M; Cintolesi V; Corvetto E; Privitera S; Palmese E; Benedetto C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 29(5):e61. PubMed ID: 30022627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New FIGO staging system of vulvar cancer indeed provides a better reflection of prognosis.
van der Steen S; de Nieuwenhof HP; Massuger L; Bulten J; de Hullu JA
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Dec; 119(3):520-5. PubMed ID: 20875914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Prognostic factors for local recurrence after primary en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin dissection.
Fonseca-Moutinho JA; Coelho MC; Silva DP
J Reprod Med; 2000 Aug; 45(8):672-8. PubMed ID: 10986688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of recurrence rate and risk factors of relapse in stage in IA vulvar carcinoma.
Schleiss-Andreassen JL; Kristensen E; Frøding LP; Stæhr E; Høgdall C; Christiansen AP; Høgdall E; Schnack TH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):543-549. PubMed ID: 34973843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system.
Baiocchi G; Silva Cestari FM; Rocha RM; Lavorato-Rocha A; Maia BM; Cestari LA; Kumagai LY; Faloppa CC; Fukazawa EM; Badiglian-Filho L; Sant'ana Rodrigues I; Soares FA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):780-5. PubMed ID: 23518307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical staging of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Analysis of treatment and survival.
Origoni M; Dindelli M; Ferrari D; Frigerio L; Rossi M; Ferrari A
Int Surg; 1996; 81(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 8803710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the 2021 FIGO staging schema for advanced vulvar cancer.
Matsuo K; Klar M; Nishio S; Mikami M; Roman LD; Wright JD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Apr; 32(4):474-479. PubMed ID: 34996835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the FIGO 2009 staging system for carcinoma of the vulva.
Tan J; Chetty N; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; Crandon A; Garrett A; Land R; Nascimento M; Nicklin J; Perrin L; Obermair A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 22367324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-team simultaneous total radical vulvectomy and inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy via separate incisions for locally advanced (FIGO stages IB ≥ 4 cm-III) squamous vulvar cancer.
Fambrini M; Sorbi F; Sisti G; Checcucci V; Cariti G; Scotti V; Tinacci E; Turrini I; Micaglio M; De Magnis A
Anticancer Res; 2014 Dec; 34(12):7345-50. PubMed ID: 25503170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging for vulvar cancer.
Hacker NF; Barlow EL
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 25842047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of pathological resection margin distance in squamous cell cancer of the vulva.
Woelber L; Choschzick M; Eulenburg C; Hager M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Kock L; Ihnen M; Petersen C; Schwarz J; Mahner S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3811-8. PubMed ID: 21594705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Margin distance and other clinico-pathologic prognostic factors in vulvar carcinoma: a multivariate analysis.
Chan JK; Sugiyama V; Pham H; Gu M; Rutgers J; Osann K; Cheung MK; Berman ML; Disaia PJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Mar; 104(3):636-41. PubMed ID: 17095080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
