BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25760856)

  • 1. Variation in responses of fishes across multiple reserves within a network of marine protected areas in temperate waters.
    Starr RM; Wendt DE; Barnes CL; Marks CI; Malone D; Waltz G; Schmidt KT; Chiu J; Launer AL; Hall NC; Yochum N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118502. PubMed ID: 25760856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs.
    Tetreault I; Ambrose RF
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Dec; 17(8):2251-67. PubMed ID: 18213966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sessile and mobile components of a benthic ecosystem display mixed trends within a temperate marine reserve.
    Howarth LM; Pickup SE; Evans LE; Cross TJ; Hawkins JP; Roberts CM; Stewart BD
    Mar Environ Res; 2015 Jun; 107():8-23. PubMed ID: 25863362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marine protected area networks in California, USA.
    Botsford LW; White JW; Carr MH; Caselle JE
    Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():205-51. PubMed ID: 25358301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.
    Smith JG; Free CM; Lopazanski C; Brun J; Anderson CR; Carr MH; Claudet J; Dugan JE; Eurich JG; Francis TB; Hamilton SL; Mouillot D; Raimondi PT; Starr RM; Ziegler SL; Nickols KJ; Caselle JE
    Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Oct; 29(19):5634-5651. PubMed ID: 37439293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
    Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
    Chirico AAD; McClanahan TR; Eklöf JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182342. PubMed ID: 28806740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
    Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status.
    White JW; Botsford LW; Moffitt EA; Fischer DT
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1523-41. PubMed ID: 20945757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
    Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Setting expected timelines of fished population recovery for the adaptive management of a marine protected area network.
    Kaplan KA; Yamane L; Botsford LW; Baskett ML; Hastings A; Worden S; White JW
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01949. PubMed ID: 31188493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
    Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Size, age, and habitat determine effectiveness of Palau's Marine Protected Areas.
    Friedlander AM; Golbuu Y; Ballesteros E; Caselle JE; Gouezo M; Olsudong D; Sala E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174787. PubMed ID: 28358910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
    Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
    Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing MPAs for food security in open-access fisheries.
    Cabral RB; Halpern BS; Lester SE; White C; Gaines SD; Costello C
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8033. PubMed ID: 31142773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design.
    Green AL; Maypa AP; Almany GR; Rhodes KL; Weeks R; Abesamis RA; Gleason MG; Mumby PJ; White AT
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Nov; 90(4):1215-47. PubMed ID: 25423947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in fish assemblages following the establishment of a network of no-take marine reserves and partially-protected areas.
    Kelaher BP; Coleman MA; Broad A; Rees MJ; Jordan A; Davis AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85825. PubMed ID: 24454934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Habitat continuity effects on gradients of fish biomass across marine protected area boundaries.
    Forcada A; Bayle-Sempere JT; Valle C; Sánchez-Jerez P
    Mar Environ Res; 2008 Dec; 66(5):536-47. PubMed ID: 18829099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas.
    Prato G; Thiriet P; Di Franco A; Francour P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178511. PubMed ID: 28594836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.