109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25760936)
1. Screening of variable importance for optimizing electrodialytic remediation of heavy metals from polluted harbour sediments.
Pedersen KB; Lejon T; Ottosen LM; Jensen PE
Environ Technol; 2015; 36(18):2364-73. PubMed ID: 25760936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multivariate methods for evaluating the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from polluted harbour sediments.
Pedersen KB; Kirkelund GM; Ottosen LM; Jensen PE; Lejon T
J Hazard Mater; 2015; 283():712-20. PubMed ID: 25464314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous electrodialytic removal of PAH, PCB, TBT and heavy metals from sediments.
Pedersen KB; Lejon T; Jensen PE; Ottosen LM
J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 1):192-202. PubMed ID: 28460326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrodialytic remediation of harbour sediment in suspension--evaluation of effects induced by changes in stirring velocity and current density on heavy metal removal and pH.
Kirkelund GM; Ottosen LM; Villumsen A
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):685-90. PubMed ID: 19409702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying multivariate analysis as decision tool for evaluating sediment-specific remediation strategies.
Pedersen KB; Lejon T; Jensen PE; Ottosen LM
Chemosphere; 2016 May; 151():59-67. PubMed ID: 26928331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrodialytic removal of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd from harbor sediment: influence of changing experimental conditions.
Nystroem GM; Ottosen LM; Villumsen A
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(8):2906-11. PubMed ID: 15884392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of desorbing agents in electrodialytic remediation of harbour sediment.
Nystroem GM; Pedersen AJ; Ottosen LM; Villumsen A
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Mar; 357(1-3):25-37. PubMed ID: 15936059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multistage remediation of heavy metal contaminated river sediments in a mining region based on particle size.
Ma T; Sheng Y; Meng Y; Sun J
Chemosphere; 2019 Jun; 225():83-92. PubMed ID: 30861386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of sulphide binding for leaching of heavy metals from contaminated Norwegian marine sediments treated by stabilization/solidification.
Sparrevik M; Eek E; Grini RS
Environ Technol; 2009 Jul; 30(8):831-40. PubMed ID: 19705667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigations of Cu, Pb and Zn partitioning by sequential extraction in harbour sediments after electrodialytic remediation.
Kirkelund GM; Ottosen LM; Villumsen A
Chemosphere; 2010 May; 79(10):997-1002. PubMed ID: 20378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research on Progress in Combined Remediation Technologies of Heavy Metal Polluted Sediment.
Zhang M; Wang X; Yang L; Chu Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31847211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Variation characteristics and potential ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the surface sediments of Bohai Bay].
Xu YY; Song JM; Li XG; Yuan HM; Li N
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Mar; 33(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 22624362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metal bioleaching from anaerobic sediments from Reconquista River basin (Argentina) as a potential remediation strategy.
Porzionato N; Tufo A; Candal R; Curutchet G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(33):25561-25570. PubMed ID: 27117150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ligand-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metal-contaminated marine sediments with high acid buffering capacity.
Masi M; Iannelli R; Losito G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Jun; 23(11):10566-10576. PubMed ID: 26490900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resuspension of sediment, a new approach for remediation of contaminated sediment.
Pourabadehei M; Mulligan CN
Environ Pollut; 2016 Jun; 213():63-75. PubMed ID: 26874876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Behavior of zinc, nickel, copper and cadmium during the electrokinetic remediation of sediment from the Great Backa Canal (Serbia).
Rajic LM; Dalmacija BD; Trickovic JS; Dalmacija MB; Krcmar DM
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Jan; 45(9):1134-43. PubMed ID: 20574868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heavy metals mobilization from harbour sediments using EDTA and citric acid as chelating agents.
Di Palma L; Mecozzi R
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Aug; 147(3):768-75. PubMed ID: 17321047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Distribution patterns of heavy metals in surface sediments of the Yangtze estuary and its adjacent areas and environmental quality assessment].
Sheng JJ; Fan DJ; Yang DF; Qi HY; Xu L
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Sep; 29(9):2405-12. PubMed ID: 19068618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of electrode placement for mobilising and removing metals during electrodialytic remediation of metals from shooting range soil.
Pedersen KB; Jensen PE; Ottosen LM; Barlindhaug J
Chemosphere; 2018 Nov; 210():683-691. PubMed ID: 30031998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Remediation of Toxic Metal Contaminated Sediment Using Three Types of nZVI Supported Materials.
Tomašević Pilipović D; Kerkez D; Dalmacija B; Slijepčević N; Krčmar D; Rađenović D; Bečelić-Tomin M
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 101(6):725-731. PubMed ID: 30244275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
