133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25761000)
1. Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions.
Goodheart JR; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1226-34. PubMed ID: 25761000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study.
Sternheim A; Giladi O; Gortzak Y; Drexler M; Salai M; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C; Yosibash Z
Bone; 2018 May; 110():215-220. PubMed ID: 29475110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?
Sternheim A; Traub F; Trabelsi N; Dadia S; Gortzak Y; Snir N; Gorfine M; Yosibash Z
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):638-645. PubMed ID: 32349590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis potentially identifies nonessential prophylactic stabilization in femurs with metastatic disease.
Johnson JE; Goetz JE; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Sep; 236(9):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 35787214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential pathogenic mechanism for stress fractures of the bowed femoral shaft in the elderly: Mechanical analysis by the CT-based finite element method.
Oh Y; Wakabayashi Y; Kurosa Y; Fujita K; Okawa A
Injury; 2014 Nov; 45(11):1764-71. PubMed ID: 25225173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.
Ataei A; Eggermont F; Verdonschot N; Lessmann N; Tanck E
Bone; 2024 Feb; 179():116987. PubMed ID: 38061504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts.
Derikx LC; van Aken JB; Janssen D; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 22844058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological fracture prediction in patients with metastatic lesions can be improved with quantitative computed tomography based computer models.
Tanck E; van Aken JB; van der Linden YM; Schreuder HW; Binkowski M; Huizenga H; Verdonschot N
Bone; 2009 Oct; 45(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 19539798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases.
Van der Linden YM; Dijkstra PD; Kroon HM; Lok JJ; Noordijk EM; Leer JW; Marijnen CA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 May; 86(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 15174555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mirels' rating for humerus lesions is both reproducible and valid.
Evans AR; Bottros J; Grant W; Chen BY; Damron TA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Jun; 466(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18357496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of pathological fracture of the femoral shaft with an osteolytic lesion using a computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method.
Chiba D; Mori Y; Sano H; Kishimoto K; Hatori M; Takahashi A; Nakajo S; Itoi E
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Jul; 21(4):530-538. PubMed ID: 27142243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength.
Haider IT; Speirs AD; Frei H
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23906770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
