These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25761328)
1. Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory. Wool LE; Komban SJ; Kremkow J; Jansen M; Li X; Alonso JM; Zaidi Q J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone photoreceptor sensitivities and unique hue chromatic responses: correlation and causation imply the physiological basis of unique hues. Pridmore RW PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77134. PubMed ID: 24204755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hue scaling of isoluminant and cone-specific lights. De Valois RL; De Valois KK; Switkes E; Mahon L Vision Res; 1997 Apr; 37(7):885-97. PubMed ID: 9156186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are red, yellow, green, and blue perceptual categories? Witzel C; Gegenfurtner KR Vision Res; 2018 Oct; 151():152-163. PubMed ID: 29653135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceiving opponent hues in color induction displays. Livitz G; Yazdanbakhsh A; Eskew RT; Mingolla E Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21406152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From cones to color vision: a neurobiological model that explains the unique hues. Rezeanu D; Neitz M; Neitz J J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2023 Mar; 40(3):A1-A8. PubMed ID: 37132996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Color naming, unique hues, and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. Philipona DL; O'Regan JK Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):331-9. PubMed ID: 16961964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cone inputs to the unique-hue mechanisms. Wuerger SM; Atkinson P; Cropper S Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3210-23. PubMed ID: 16087209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circuitry to explain how the relative number of L and M cones shapes color experience. Schmidt BP; Touch P; Neitz M; Neitz J J Vis; 2016 Jun; 16(8):18. PubMed ID: 27366885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Seeing unique hues. Abramov I; Gordon J J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Oct; 22(10):2143-53. PubMed ID: 16277284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between peripherally matched invariant hues and unique hues: a cone-contrast approach. Panorgias A; Kulikowski JJ; Parry NR; McKeefry DJ; Murray IJ J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Feb; 29(2):A233-9. PubMed ID: 22330384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Naming versus matching and the stability of unique hues. Panorgias A; Kulikowski JJ; Parry NR; McKeefry DJ; Murray IJ Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 20883339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does L/M cone opponency disappear in human periphery? Mullen KT; Sakurai M; Chu W Perception; 2005; 34(8):951-9. PubMed ID: 16178149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of rod signals on hue perception: evidence from successive scotopic contrast. Buck SL Vision Res; 1997 May; 37(10):1295-301. PubMed ID: 9205721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opponent-color models and the influence of rod signals on the loci of unique hues. Buck SL; Knight RF; Bechtold J Vision Res; 2000; 40(24):3333-44. PubMed ID: 11058732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in induced hues at low luminance and following dark adaptation suggest rod-cone interactions may differ for luminance increments and decrements. Shepherd AJ; Wyatt G Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 18598407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-dependent red-green hue shift. Buck SL; Rieke F; DeLawyer T J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Apr; 35(4):B136-B143. PubMed ID: 29603967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]