BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25763728)

  • 1. MR imaging and PET/CT in diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma.
    Ferraro R; Agarwal A; Martin-Macintosh EL; Peller PJ; Subramaniam RM
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(2):438-54. PubMed ID: 25763728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT.
    Hanrahan CJ; Christensen CR; Crim JR
    Radiographics; 2010 Jan; 30(1):127-42. PubMed ID: 20083590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolving role of FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma imaging and management.
    Agarwal A; Chirindel A; Shah BA; Subramaniam RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):884-90. PubMed ID: 23521465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. F-18 FDG PET/CT staging of multiple myeloma with diffuse osseous and extramedullary lesions.
    Wiesenthal AA; Nguyen BD
    Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Oct; 32(10):797-801. PubMed ID: 17885362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography and advanced imaging techniques for multiple myeloma bone disease.
    Pianko MJ; Terpos E; Roodman GD; Divgi CR; Zweegman S; Hillengass J; Lentzsch S
    Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Dec; 20(23):5888-97. PubMed ID: 25294899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma.
    Fonti R; Salvatore B; Quarantelli M; Sirignano C; Segreto S; Petruzziello F; Catalano L; Liuzzi R; Rotoli B; Del Vecchio S; Pace L; Salvatore M
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Feb; 49(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18199607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging of multiple myeloma: usefulness of MRI and PET/CT.
    Koppula B; Kaptuch J; Hanrahan CJ
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2013 Dec; 34(6):566-77. PubMed ID: 24332208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of imaging techniques in the management of multiple myeloma.
    Zamagni E; Cavo M
    Br J Haematol; 2012 Dec; 159(5):499-513. PubMed ID: 22881361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Imaging techniques in multiple myeloma].
    Ozaki S
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2261-7. PubMed ID: 18069271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the post-therapy surveillance of breast cancer.
    Chang HT; Hu C; Chiu YL; Peng NJ; Liu RS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115127. PubMed ID: 25517451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
    Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. State-of-the-art of bone marrow imaging in multiple myeloma.
    Martí-Bonmatí L; Ramirez-Fuentes C; Alberich-Bayarri Á; Ruiz-Llorca C
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 27(6):540-50. PubMed ID: 26352540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple myeloma.
    Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2009 Jun; 13(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 19455474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography.
    Mahnken AH; Wildberger JE; Gehbauer G; Schmitz-Rode T; Blaum M; Fabry U; Günther RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jun; 178(6):1429-36. PubMed ID: 12034612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
    Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
    Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The importance of imaging techniques in the modern treatment of multiple myeloma].
    Jurczyszyn A; Małkowski B; Czepiel J; Skotnicki AB
    Przegl Lek; 2014; 71(4):221-30. PubMed ID: 25141582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of myeloma.
    D'Sa S; Abildgaard N; Tighe J; Shaw P; Hall-Craggs M
    Br J Haematol; 2007 Apr; 137(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 17359371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma.
    Dimopoulos M; Terpos E; Comenzo RL; Tosi P; Beksac M; Sezer O; Siegel D; Lokhorst H; Kumar S; Rajkumar SV; Niesvizky R; Moulopoulos LA; Durie BG;
    Leukemia; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1545-56. PubMed ID: 19421229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging in multiple myeloma.
    Delorme S; Baur-Melnyk A
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 19272726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal Survey in Multiple Myeloma: Role of Imaging.
    Spinnato P; Filonzi G; Conficoni A; Facchini G; Ponti F; Sambri A; De Paolis M; Cavo M; Salizzoni E; Nanni C
    Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(8):956-965. PubMed ID: 33573573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.