152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25763918)
1. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements.
Meng HZ; Zhang WL; Li XC; Yang MW
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1250-4. PubMed ID: 25763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus.
Ege T; Kose O; Koca K; Demiralp B; Basbozkurt M
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Feb; 42(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22669733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis.
Shaw M; Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Licina P; Askin GN
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1062-8. PubMed ID: 22065167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Incorrect Foot Placement on the Accuracy of Radiographic Measurements of the Hallux Valgus and Inter-Metatarsal Angles for Treating Hallux Valgus.
Kuyucu E; Ceylan HH; Surucu S; Erdil I; Kara A; Gulenc BG; Bulbul M; Erdil M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 28809639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study.
Wang L; Zhang C; Liang H; Zhang J; Zhong W; Zhao Z; Huang T; Luo X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):315. PubMed ID: 35366850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of Two Smartphone Applications for Radiographic Measurements of Hallux Valgus Angles.
Mattos E Dinato MC; Freitas MF; Milano C; Valloto E; Ninomiya AF; Pagnano RG
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):230-233. PubMed ID: 28231958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measurement on smartphone digital photographs.
Cakar A; Kose O; Dogruoz F; Selcuk H; Kirtis T; Egerci OF
J Foot Ankle Res; 2023 Oct; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 37840128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles.
Walter R; Kosy JD; Cove R
Foot Ankle Surg; 2013 Mar; 19(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 23337271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones.
Huang T; Wang L; Lu C; Zhong W; Zhao Z; Luo X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Aug; 22(1):716. PubMed ID: 34419028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Point-Connecting Measurements of the Hallux Valgus Deformity: A New Measurement and Its Clinical Application.
Seo JH; Ahn JY; Boedijono D
Yonsei Med J; 2016 May; 57(3):741-7. PubMed ID: 26996576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Radiographic Hallux Valgus Interphalangeus With Surgical Correction of Hallux Valgus.
Dixon AE; Lee LC; Charlton TP; Thordarson DB
Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Aug; 36(8):961-8. PubMed ID: 25862100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements.
Srivastava S; Chockalingam N; El Fakhri T
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 20833569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Angle to Be Corrected" in Preoperative Evaluation for Hallux Valgus Surgery: Analysis of a New Angular Measurement.
Ortiz C; Wagner P; Vela O; Fischman D; Cavada G; Wagner E
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Feb; 37(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 26525223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet.
Jastifer JR; Coughlin MJ; Schutt S; Hirose C; Kennedy M; Grebing B; Smith B; Cooper T; Golano P; Viladot R; Doty JF
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Apr; 35(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 24521690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program.
Piqué-Vidal C; Maled-García I; Arabi-Moreno J; Vila J
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Mar; 27(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 16539898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of a smartphone protractor to measure sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity.
Kunkle WA; Madden M; Potts S; Fogelson J; Hershman S
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1559-1564. PubMed ID: 28818564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy.
Shima H; Okuda R; Yasuda T; Jotoku T; Kitano N; Kinoshita M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 19487514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative radiological factors correlated to long-term recurrence of hallux valgus following distal chevron osteotomy.
Pentikainen I; Ojala R; Ohtonen P; Piippo J; Leppilahti J
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1262-7. PubMed ID: 25192724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hallux Valgus Evaluation on MRI: Can Measurements Validated on Radiographs Be Used?
Heineman N; Xi Y; Zhang L; Dessouky R; Hummel J; Skweres J; Wukich D; Chhabra A
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018; 57(2):305-308. PubMed ID: 29331288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of hallux valgus angular measurements and the study of a linear measurement.
Sanhudo JV; Gomes JE; Rabello MC; Delucca G
Foot Ankle Spec; 2012 Dec; 5(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 22965218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
