These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25764719)

  • 1. [Cytotoxicity of a new type silicone rubber for maxillofacial prosthesis: an in vitro evaluation].
    Tian A; Chen Y; Liao J; Sun X; Teng M; Liang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 31(5):1046-9, 1056. PubMed ID: 25764719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of RTC-silicone maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers on cell cultures.
    Polyzois GL; Hensten-Pettersen A; Kullman A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 May; 71(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 8006848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: effect of accelerated aging.
    Bal BT; Yilmaz H; Aydin C; Karakoca S; Yilmaz S
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Apr; 89(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 18712813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of in vitro cytotoxicity of four RTV-silicone elastomers used for maxillo-facial prostheses.
    Hensten-Pettersen A; Hulterström A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1980; 38(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 6932162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toxicity evaluation of a novel filler free silicone rubber biomaterial by cell culture techniques.
    Chawla AS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 7050127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biofunctionalization of silicone rubber with microgroove-patterned surface and carbon-ion implantation to enhance biocompatibility and reduce capsule formation.
    Lei ZY; Liu T; Li WJ; Shi XH; Fan DL
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2016; 11():5563-5572. PubMed ID: 27822035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomers: Effect of Nano-particles.
    Akay C; Cevik P; Karakis D; Sevim H
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):584-587. PubMed ID: 27598829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical properties and bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers.
    Hatamleh MM; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 19892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface modification of an experimental silicone rubber maxillofacial material to improve wettability.
    Aziz T; Waters M; Jagger R
    J Dent; 2003 Mar; 31(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 12726706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility of primers and an adhesive used for implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: An in vitro analysis.
    Bonatto LDR; Goiato MC; da Silva EVF; Oliveira SHP; Haddad MF; Chaves Neto AH; Brito VGB; Dos Santos DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 27836141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface Coating of Gypsum-Based Molds for Maxillofacial Prosthetic Silicone Elastomeric Material: The Surface Topography.
    Khalaf S; Ariffin Z; Husein A; Reza F
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 25219956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Coating on the Surface of Silicone Rubber Nasogastric Tube].
    Gou J; Cai M; Li J; Wang Z; Liu Y; Tu R; Ran Y; Lin X; Li K; Xu J
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Jul; 54(4):782-787. PubMed ID: 37545074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experimental studies on cutaneous tissue reaction to heat-vulcanized silicone rubber and polyurethane as facial prosthesis materials].
    Tanabe T
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1984 Jan; 10(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6588656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative evaluation of the change in hardness, of two commonly used maxillofacial prosthetic silicone elastomers, as subjected to simulated weathering in tropical climatic conditions.
    Kheur MG; Sethi T; Coward T; Jambhekar SS
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 20(4):146-50. PubMed ID: 23495554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Porosity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers and microleakage pattern of the commercially pure Ti-silicone elastomer interface after hydrothermal cycling.
    Artopoulou II; Chambers MS; Eliades G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):937-942. PubMed ID: 27460319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
    Montgomery PC; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 20002975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of effect of laser etching on shear bond strength between maxillofacial silicone and acrylic resin subjected to accelerated aging process.
    Rhea A; Ahila SC; Kumar BM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 29072210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: Part I--Literature review.
    Andres CJ; Haug SP; Munoz CA; Bernal G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 1501184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of time passage on some physical properties of silicone maxillofacial elastomers.
    Polyzois GL; Eleni PN; Krokida MK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1617-21. PubMed ID: 21959399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlling the porosity and density of silicone rubber prosthetic materials.
    Kent K; Zeigel RF; Kent K; Frost AL; Schaaf NG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Aug; 50(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 6578331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.