These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25765190)

  • 1. Number and localization of the implants for the fixed prosthetic reconstructions: on the strain in the anterior maxillary region.
    Bölükbaşı N; Yeniyol S
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):431-45. PubMed ID: 25765190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of implant number and distribution on load transfer in implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses for the anterior maxilla: A photoelastic stress analysis study.
    Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim YL; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 26548878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.
    Corrêa CB; Margonar R; Noritomi PY; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24355510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
    Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical Study of Optimal Implant Position for Maxillary Implant-Supported Overdentures Using Three-Dimensional Simulation Software.
    Kamei K; Gonda T; Takahashi T; Maeda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(6):619–626. PubMed ID: 30192350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short implant to support maxillary restorations: bone stress analysis using regular and switching platform.
    de Carvalho NA; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; Kina S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):678-81. PubMed ID: 22565882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data.
    Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
    Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical effects of different fixed partial denture designs planned on bicortically anchored short, graft-supported long, or 45-degree-inclined long implants in the posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Seker E; Ulusoy M; Ozan O; Doğan DÖ; Seker BK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):e1-9. PubMed ID: 24451875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.