588 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25765744)
1. Women׳s birthplace decision-making, the role of confidence: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study, New Zealand.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Daellenbach R; Kensington M
Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 25765744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A
Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Monk A; Tracy MB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():339. PubMed ID: 26679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
Grigg C; Tracy SK; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Schmied V
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jun; 14():210. PubMed ID: 24951093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating midwifery units (EMU): lessons from the pilot study.
Monk AR; Tracy SK; Foureur M; Tracy M
Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):845-51. PubMed ID: 23395304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remote rural women's choice of birthplace and transfer experiences in rural Otago and Southland New Zealand.
Patterson J; Foureur M; Skinner J
Midwifery; 2017 Sep; 52():49-56. PubMed ID: 28600971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer.
Monk AR; Grigg CP; Foureur M; Tracy M; Tracy SK
Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():24-28. PubMed ID: 28126592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Monk A; Schmied V
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016288. PubMed ID: 28851782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
Christensen LF; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups.
Hinton L; Dumelow C; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 29310599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deciding on home or hospital birth: results of the Ontario Choice of Birthplace Survey.
Murray-Davis B; McDonald H; Rietsma A; Coubrough M; Hutton E
Midwifery; 2014 Jul; 30(7):869-76. PubMed ID: 24613009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Choosing an out-of-hospital birth centre: Exploring women's decision-making experiences.
Wood RJ; Mignone J; Heaman MI; Robinson KJ; Roger KS
Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():12-9. PubMed ID: 27321715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experiences of women who planned birth in a birth centre compared to alternative planned places of birth. Results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
Hitzert M; Hermus MA; Scheerhagen M; Boesveld IC; Wiegers TA; van den Akker-van Marle ME; van Dommelen P; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; de Graaf JP
Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():70-8. PubMed ID: 27428101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organising safe and sustainable care in alongside midwifery units: Findings from an organisational ethnographic study.
McCourt C; Rance S; Rayment J; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2018 Oct; 65():26-34. PubMed ID: 30032066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How optimal caseload midwifery can modify predictors for preterm birth in young women: Integrated findings from a mixed methods study.
Allen J; Kildea S; Stapleton H
Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():30-38. PubMed ID: 27498186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwife-led maternity services and consumer 'choice' in an Australian metropolitan region.
Zadoroznyj M
Midwifery; 2000 Sep; 16(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10970751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy.
Butler MM; Sheehy L; Kington MM; Walsh MC; Brosnan MC; Murphy M; Naughton C; Drennan J; Barry T
Midwifery; 2015 Apr; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 25554699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organisational strategies and midwives' readiness to provide care for out of hospital births: an analysis from the birthplace organisational case studies.
McCourt C; Rayment J; Rance S; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 22938797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
