These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25766056)

  • 1. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews.
    Rethlefsen ML; Farrell AM; Osterhaus Trzasko LC; Brigham TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 25766056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
    Schellinger J; Sewell K; Bloss JE; Ebron T; Forbes C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256833. PubMed ID: 34469487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors.
    Koffel JB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125931. PubMed ID: 25938454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Rethlefsen ML; Schroter S; Bouter LM; Moher D; Ayala AP; Kirkham JJ; Zeegers MP
    Trials; 2021 Nov; 22(1):791. PubMed ID: 34763714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews.
    Meert D; Torabi N; Costella J
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):267-277. PubMed ID: 27822147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: a cross-sectional survey.
    Pawliuk C; Cheng S; Zheng A; Siden HH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111237. PubMed ID: 38072177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Koffel JB; Rethlefsen ML
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163309. PubMed ID: 27669416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians' contributions to systematic reviews.
    Brunskill A; Hanneke R
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Oct; 110(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 37101926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian.
    Li L; Tian J; Tian H; Moher D; Liang F; Jiang T; Yao L; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 24841794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.
    Franco JVA; Garrote VL; Escobar Liquitay CM; Vietto V
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 29761662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.
    Bullers K; Howard AM; Hanson A; Kearns WD; Orriola JJ; Polo RL; Sakmar KA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Apr; 106(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 29632442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical Assessment of Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews in Endodontics.
    Yaylali IE; Alaçam T
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):854-60. PubMed ID: 27071976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language Consideration and Methodological Transparency in "Systematic" Reviews of Animal Toxicity Studies.
    Alpi KM; Vo TA; Dorman DC
    Int J Toxicol; 2019; 38(2):135-145. PubMed ID: 30791753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the Reach and Impact of a Systematic Review Service.
    Healy HS; Regan M; Deberg J
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2020; 39(2):125-138. PubMed ID: 32329673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the roles and challenges of librarians in dental systematic and scoping reviews.
    Schvaneveldt N; Stellrecht EM
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 33424464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews.
    Maggio LA; Tannery NH; Kanter SL
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1049-54. PubMed ID: 21694568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
    Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.