134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25766389)
1. Mechanical assessment of cervical remodelling in pregnancy: insight from a synthetic model.
Peralta L; Rus G; Bochud N; Molina FS
J Biomech; 2015 Jun; 48(9):1557-65. PubMed ID: 25766389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing viscoelasticity of shear wave propagation in cervical tissue by multiscale computational simulation.
Peralta L; Rus G; Bochud N; Molina FS
J Biomech; 2015 Jun; 48(9):1549-56. PubMed ID: 25700611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kelvin-Voigt Parameters Reconstruction of Cervical Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms Using Torsional Wave Elastography.
Callejas A; Gomez A; Faris IH; Melchor J; Rus G
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31349721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The theory of fibre-reinforced composite materials applied to changes in the mechanical properties of the cervix during pregnancy.
Aspden RM
J Theor Biol; 1988 Jan; 130(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 3419181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of biomechanical properties in vivo in human uterine cervix.
Liao D; Hee L; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N; Gregersen H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():27-37. PubMed ID: 25084120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical collagen network remodeling in normal pregnancy and disrupted parturition in Antxr2 deficient mice.
Yoshida K; Reeves C; Vink J; Kitajewski J; Wapner R; Jiang H; Cremers S; Myers K
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Feb; 136(2):021017. PubMed ID: 24390076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fibre-reinforced poroviscoelastic model accurately describes the biomechanical behaviour of the rat Achilles tendon.
Khayyeri H; Gustafsson A; Heuijerjans A; Matikainen MK; Julkunen P; Eliasson P; Aspenberg P; Isaksson H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126869. PubMed ID: 26030436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between mechanical properties and extracellular matrix constituents of the cervical stroma during pregnancy.
House M; Kaplan DL; Socrate S
Semin Perinatol; 2009 Oct; 33(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 19796726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model describing the mechanical response of human and mouse cervix.
Shi L; Hu L; Lee N; Fang S; Myers K
Acta Biomater; 2022 Sep; 150():277-294. PubMed ID: 35931278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Viscoelastic model characterization of human cervical tissue by torsional waves.
Callejas A; Melchor J; Faris IH; Rus G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104261. PubMed ID: 33340778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical and biochemical properties of human cervical tissue.
Myers KM; Paskaleva AP; House M; Socrate S
Acta Biomater; 2008 Jan; 4(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 17904431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A continuous fiber distribution material model for human cervical tissue.
Myers KM; Hendon CP; Gan Y; Yao W; Yoshida K; Fernandez M; Vink J; Wapner RJ
J Biomech; 2015 Jun; 48(9):1533-40. PubMed ID: 25817474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Material properties of mouse cervical tissue in normal gestation.
Yoshida K; Mahendroo M; Vink J; Wapner R; Myers K
Acta Biomater; 2016 May; 36():195-209. PubMed ID: 26961804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New techniques in evaluation of the cervix.
Feltovich H; Carlson L
Semin Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 41(8):477-484. PubMed ID: 29191290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A viscoelastic two-dimensional network model of the lung extracellular matrix.
Iravani A; Thambyah A; Burrowes KS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2241-2253. PubMed ID: 32410075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.
Fruscalzo A; Mazza E; Feltovich H; Schmitz R
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Oct; 43(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27259500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical and structural changes of the rat cervix in late-stage pregnancy.
Poellmann MJ; Chien EK; McFarlin BL; Wagoner Johnson AJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jan; 17():66-75. PubMed ID: 23127627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy.
Mazza E; Parra-Saavedra M; Bajka M; Gratacos E; Nicolaides K; Deprest J
Prenat Diagn; 2014 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 24155152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative evaluation of collagen crosslinks and corresponding tensile mechanical properties in mouse cervical tissue during normal pregnancy.
Yoshida K; Jiang H; Kim M; Vink J; Cremers S; Paik D; Wapner R; Mahendroo M; Myers K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112391. PubMed ID: 25397407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collagen concentration and biomechanical properties of samples from the lower uterine cervix in relation to age and parity in non-pregnant women.
Oxlund BS; Ørtoft G; Brüel A; Danielsen CC; Bor P; Oxlund H; Uldbjerg N
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2010 Jul; 8():82. PubMed ID: 20604933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
