These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25766400)

  • 1. Leveraging state cancer registries to measure and improve the quality of cancer care: a potential strategy for California and beyond.
    Hiatt RA; Tai CG; Blayney DW; Deapen D; Hogarth M; Kizer KW; Lipscomb J; Malin J; Phillips SK; Santa J; Schrag D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Mar; 107(5):. PubMed ID: 25766400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.
    Meguerditchian AN; Stewart A; Roistacher J; Watroba N; Cropp M; Edge SB
    J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 101(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 20461766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: implications for quality of care research.
    Mallin K; Palis BE; Watroba N; Stewart AK; Walczak D; Singer J; Barron J; Blumenthal W; Haydu G; Edge SB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 23357724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of deterministic record linkage using multiple indirect personal identifiers: linking a large registry to claims data.
    Setoguchi S; Zhu Y; Jalbert JJ; Williams LA; Chen CY
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 May; 7(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 24755909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond the EHR. Examining the next technology drivers in healthcare improvement.
    Ingari F
    Health Manag Technol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):20. PubMed ID: 23420988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer registry enrichment via linkage with hospital-based electronic medical records: a pilot investigation.
    Hernandez MN; Voti L; Feldman JD; Tannenbaum SL; Scharber W; Mackinnon JA; Lee DJ; Huang YX
    J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 23778697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Record linkage of a large clinical practice patient cohort with the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein].
    Obi N; Waldmann A; Babaev V; Katalinic A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Jul; 73(7):452-8. PubMed ID: 20549597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study.
    Fleming ST; Kimmick GG; Sabatino SA; Cress RD; Wu XC; Trentham-Dietz A; Huang B; Hwang W; Liff JM;
    Ann Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 22(11):807-13. PubMed ID: 22948184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
    Malin JL; Kahn KL; Adams J; Kwan L; Laouri M; Ganz PA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):835-44. PubMed ID: 12048271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structured electronic health records.
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Haugland HK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2014 Feb; 134(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 24569746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality.
    Logan JR; Lieberman DA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):717-34. PubMed ID: 20889074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linking claims and cancer registry data: is it worth the effort?
    Fleming ST; Kohrs FP
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1998; 6(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 10180128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The California Clinical Data Project: a case study in the adoption of clinical data standards for quality improvement.
    Sujansky W; Chang S
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(3):71-8. PubMed ID: 16903664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linkage of a clinical surgical registry with Medicare inpatient claims data using indirect identifiers.
    Lawson EH; Ko CY; Louie R; Han L; Rapp M; Zingmond DS
    Surgery; 2013 Mar; 153(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 23122901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data.
    Riley GF
    Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S51-5. PubMed ID: 19536019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting).
    Webster AC; Supramaniam R; O'Connell DL; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Jun; 15(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 20609104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Record linkage for pharmacoepidemiological studies in cancer patients.
    Herk-Sukel MP; Lemmens VE; Poll-Franse LV; Herings RM; Coebergh JW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 21812067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensuring quality in studies linking cancer registries and biobanks.
    Langseth H; Luostarinen T; Bray F; Dillner J
    Acta Oncol; 2010 Apr; 49(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 20059313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing a sustainable national registry for stroke quality improvement.
    Schwamm L; Reeves MJ; Frankel M
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Dec; 31(6 Suppl 2):S251-7. PubMed ID: 17178314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epidemiological data sources in Estonia: a survey of registries and databases.
    Innos K; Rahu M
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 11142605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.