These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25766461)

  • 41. In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.
    Geçkil N; Can Tukel H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 35065834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Biomechanical evaluation of a T-shaped miniplate fixation of a modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy with buccal step, a new technique for mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Aymach Z; Nei H; Kawamura H; Bell W
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 20580286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of stress distribution in resorbable screw fixation system: three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular setback surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Choi JP; Baek SH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1104-9. PubMed ID: 20613578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
    Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Establishment and primary analysis of the three-dimensional finite element model of mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid internal fixation].
    Xu CT; Sun GL; Zhou J; Wang PL
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 May; 23(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 17649942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles.
    Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stability of biodegradable metal (Mg-Ca-Zn alloy) screws compared with absorbable polymer and titanium screws for sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using the finite element analysis model.
    Lee JH; Han HS; Kim YC; Lee JY; Lee BK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1639-1646. PubMed ID: 28818322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The relationship between fixation method and early central condylar sagging after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in orthognathic surgery.
    Berköz Ö; Karaali S; Kozanoğlu E; Akalın BE; Çeri A; Barış Ş; Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 48(10):928-932. PubMed ID: 32873467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rigid fixation of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Fujimura K; Bessho K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1170-3. PubMed ID: 21802187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How effective is a thick plate on stabilisation in 10 mm mandibular advancement?
    Esen A; Menziletoglu D; Aybüke Erdur E; Akkulah S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jul; 60(6):803-809. PubMed ID: 35437194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Biomechanical evaluation of magnesium-based resorbable metallic screw system in a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy model using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lee JY; Lee JW; Pang KM; Kim HE; Kim SM; Lee JH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 72(2):402.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24280169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of bicortical, miniplate and hybrid fixation techniques in mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation: A finite element analysis study.
    Can S; Basa S; Varol A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):e7-e14. PubMed ID: 33848666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: assessment of 9 methods via finite element method.
    Bohluli B; Motamedi MH; Bohluli P; Sarkarat F; Moharamnejad N; Tabrizi MH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2765-9. PubMed ID: 20708317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Resistance and Stress Finite Element Analysis of Different Types of Fixation for Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery.
    Stringhini DJ; Sommerfeld R; Uetanabaro LC; Leonardi DP; Araújo MR; Rebellato NL; Costa DJ; Scariot R
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 27224561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Murphy MT; Haug RH; Barber JE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 May; 55(5):489-94; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 9146519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiographic stereophotogrammetric evaluation of intersegmental stability after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation.
    Wall G; Rosenquist B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 59(12):1427-35; discussion 1435-6. PubMed ID: 11732029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.