These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25766491)
1. Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants. Newbold C; Risi F; Hollow R; Yusof Y; Dowell R Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 25766491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients. Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels. van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected? Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: Impedance changes over time with different cochlear implant electrode arrays. Powell HR; Birman CS Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 26098963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays. Mussoi BS; Meibos A; Woodson E; Sydlowski S Cochlear Implants Int; 2024 Jan; 25(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 38081181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Saunders E; Cohen L; Aschendorff A; Shapiro W; Knight M; Stecker M; Richter B; Waltzman S; Tykocinski M; Roland T; Laszig R; Cowan R Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):28S-40S. PubMed ID: 11883764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence, Time Course, and Implications of Electrode Abnormalities in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Harris JM; Neault MW; O'Neill EE; Griffin AM; Kawai K; Kenna MA; Licameli GR Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):334-342. PubMed ID: 32826503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique. Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances. Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Extrusion of straight cochlear implant electrodes May be diminished by proximal fixation. Zawawi F; Cushing SL; James AL; Gordon KA; Papsin BC Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():164-167. PubMed ID: 30554690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays. Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants. Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids. Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation. Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical case study review: steroid-responsive change in electrode impedance. Wolfe J; Baker RS; Wood M Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23295725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients. Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]