246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25767157)
1. Belief in the malleability of groups strengthens the tenuous link between a collective apology and intergroup forgiveness.
Wohl MJ; Cohen-Chen S; Halperin E; Caouette J; Hayes N; Hornsey MJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25767157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why group apologies succeed and fail: intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions.
Wohl MJ; Hornsey MJ; Bennett SH
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 21806306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Mandate of the Collective: Apology Representativeness Determines Perceived Sincerity and Forgiveness in Intergroup Contexts.
Wenzel M; Okimoto TG; Hornsey MJ; Lawrence-Wood E; Coughlin AM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):758-771. PubMed ID: 28903668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What happens when groups say sorry: the effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients.
Philpot CR; Hornsey MJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-87. PubMed ID: 18340033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of Beliefs in Intergroup Forgiveness in a Chilean General Population Sample.
Cárdenas M; Arnoso M; Páez D
Span J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 18():E37. PubMed ID: 26073461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Embodied remorse: Physical displays of remorse increase positive responses to public apologies, but have negligible effects on forgiveness.
Hornsey MJ; Wohl MJA; Harris EA; Okimoto TG; Thai M; Wenzel M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Aug; 119(2):367-389. PubMed ID: 31512916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Costly group apology communicates a group's sincere "intention".
Ohtsubo Y; Matsunaga M; Himichi T; Suzuki K; Shibata E; Hori R; Umemura T; Ohira H
Soc Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 15(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 31762397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How voluntariness of apologies affects actual and hypothetical victims' perceptions of the offender.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M; Maskaly J
J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(6):727-45. PubMed ID: 23057192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apologies as signals for change? Implicit theories of personality and reactions to apologies during the #MeToo movement.
Schumann K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226047. PubMed ID: 31869325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Taking up offenses: secondhand forgiveness and group identification.
Brown RP; Wohl MJ; Exline JJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1406-19. PubMed ID: 18768746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of forgiveness and apology on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery in response to mental stress.
Whited MC; Wheat AL; Larkin KT
J Behav Med; 2010 Aug; 33(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 20364307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudinal ambivalence, rumination, and forgiveness of partner transgressions in marriage.
Kachadourian LK; Fincham F; Davila J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Mar; 31(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15657449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural correlates of receiving an apology and active forgiveness: an FMRI study.
Strang S; Utikal V; Fischbacher U; Weber B; Falk A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87654. PubMed ID: 24505303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences in apology acceptance and forgiveness: the influence of handedness.
Stein JM; Miller NS
Laterality; 2019 Sep; 24(5):559-581. PubMed ID: 30482082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Account of Earned Forgiveness through Apology.
Roadevin C
Philosophia (Ramat Gan); 2017; 45(4):1785-1802. PubMed ID: 30147183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting intergroup contact by changing beliefs: group malleability, intergroup anxiety, and contact motivation.
Halperin E; Crisp RJ; Husnu S; Trzesniewski KH; Dweck CS; Gross JJ
Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1192-5. PubMed ID: 22642339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of theory of mind, group membership, and apology in intergroup forgiveness among children and adolescents.
Mulvey KL; Gönültaş S; Herry E; Strelan P
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Mar; 151(3):613-627. PubMed ID: 34647787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two is better than one: Apologies from two robots are preferred.
Okada Y; Kimoto M; Iio T; Shimohara K; Shiomi M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281604. PubMed ID: 36812194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of negotiated and delegated apologies in settlement negotiation.
Robbennolt JK
Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 23244602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who confronts prejudice?: the role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice.
Rattan A; Dweck CS
Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):952-9. PubMed ID: 20551213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
