These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25767426)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal fracture fixation: application of a 90° internal fixation model.
    Watt AJ; Ching RP; Huang JI
    Hand (N Y); 2015 Mar; 10(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 25767426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws.
    Dyrna FGE; Avery DM; Yoshida R; Lam D; Oeckenpöhler S; Cote MP; Obopilwe E; Rodner CM; Mazzocca AD
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):335. PubMed ID: 33827523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Metacarpal Fracture Plating Constructs Under Cyclic Loading.
    Tannenbaum EP; Burns GT; Oak NR; Lawton JN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Mar; 42(3):e159-e165. PubMed ID: 28259280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of metacarpal plating methods.
    Sohn RC; Jahng KH; Curtiss SB; Szabo RM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 33(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 18343284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plating of metacarpal fractures with locked or nonlocked screws, a biomechanical study: how many cortices are really necessary?
    Barr C; Behn AW; Yao J
    Hand (N Y); 2013 Dec; 8(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24426966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation for metacarpal neck fracture: a biomechanical study.
    Malasitt P; Owen JR; Tremblay MA; Wayne JS; Isaacs JE
    Hand (N Y); 2015 Sep; 10(3):438-43. PubMed ID: 26330775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model.
    Gajendran VK; Szabo RM; Myo GK; Curtiss SB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1851-8. PubMed ID: 19897325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioabsorbable miniplating versus metallic fixation for metacarpal fractures.
    Waris E; Ashammakhi N; Happonen H; Raatikainen T; Kaarela O; Törmälä P; Santavirta S; Konttinen YT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):310-9. PubMed ID: 12771846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
    Doornink J; Fitzpatrick DC; Boldhaus S; Madey SM; Bottlang M
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of soft tissues in metacarpal fracture fixation.
    Ouellette EA; Dennis JJ; Milne EL; Latta LL; Makowski AL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jul; (412):169-75. PubMed ID: 12838068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture Fixation Strength in Metacarpal Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing Using a 3-Point Bending Model: A Cadaveric, Biomechanical Study.
    Beaumont CM; Beason DP; McKeon KE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 Jan; 49(1):57.e1-57.e6. PubMed ID: 35803782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Locked versus standard unlocked plating of the pubic symphysis: a cadaver biomechanical study.
    Grimshaw CS; Bledsoe JG; Moed BR
    J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jul; 26(7):402-6. PubMed ID: 22183199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between locking and non-locking plates for fixation of metacarpal fractures in an animal model.
    Ochman S; Doht S; Paletta J; Langer M; Raschke MJ; Meffert RH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 20299161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing fixation strength in periprosthetic femur fractures by orthogonal plating-A biomechanical study.
    Lenz M; Stoffel K; Gueorguiev B; Klos K; Kielstein H; Hofmann GO
    J Orthop Res; 2016 Apr; 34(4):591-6. PubMed ID: 26447634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of bicortical locking versus unicortical far-cortex-abutting locking screw-plate fixation for comminuted radial shaft fractures.
    Overturf SJ; Morris RP; Gugala Z; Lindsey RW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):1907-13. PubMed ID: 25149898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation.
    Shazar N; Brumback RJ; Novak VP; Belkoff SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):215-22. PubMed ID: 9678050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design optimisation and experimental evaluation of dorsal double plating fixation for distal radius fracture.
    Chen AC; Lin YH; Kuo HN; Yu TC; Sun MT; Lin CL
    Injury; 2013 Apr; 44(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23099020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.