114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25767846)
41. Validation of the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
Park SH; Song YJC; Demetriou EA; Pepper KL; Thomas EE; Hickie IB; Guastella AJ
Psychiatry Res; 2020 Sep; 291():113300. PubMed ID: 32763554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Pregnancy-Related Thoughts Scale.
Oliva-Pérez J; Cabrero-García J; Cabañero-Martínez MJ; Richart-Martínez M; Oliver-Roig A
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2019 Sep; 48(5):526-537. PubMed ID: 31394073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. What worries first-year students? Psychometric properties of the Student Worry Scale.
Fam JY; Murugan SB; Yap CYL
Scand J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 61(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 32086948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A psychometric evaluation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale with palliative care samples in three African countries.
Siegert R; Selman L; Higginson IJ; Ali Z; Powell RA; Namisango E; Mwangi-Powell F; Gwyther L; Gikaara N; Harding R
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Nov; 48(5):983-91. PubMed ID: 24742786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The unintended consequences of cervical screening: distress in women undergoing cytologic surveillance.
Sharp L; Cotton S; Cruickshank M; Gray NM; Harrild K; Smart L; Walker LG; Little J;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Apr; 18(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 24270192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Development and Validation of the Sexual and Relationship Distress Scale.
Frost R; Donovan C
J Sex Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):1167-1179. PubMed ID: 30033190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Measuring the Psychosocial Dimensions of Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Psychometrics of the German Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer-Psychosocial Questionnaire.
Grünke B; Philipp R; Vehling S; Scheffold K; Härter M; Oechsle K; Schulz-Kindermann F; Mehnert A; Lo C
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2018 Mar; 55(3):985-991.e1. PubMed ID: 29155291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Sense of Coherence Scale in women with cervical cancer.
Ding Y; Bao LP; Xu H; Hu Y; Hallberg IR
Psychooncology; 2012 Nov; 21(11):1205-14. PubMed ID: 21823198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in the Korean working population.
Jun D; Johnston V; Kim JM; O'Leary S
Work; 2018; 59(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 29439379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Examining the Psychometric Properties of Three Standardized Screening Tools in a Pregnant and Parenting Population.
Benediktsson I; McDonald S; Tough S
Matern Child Health J; 2017 Feb; 21(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27475825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Psychometric properties of the French versions of the Perceived Stress Scale.
Lesage FX; Berjot S; Deschamps F
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2012 Jun; 25(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22528542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Can compassionate healthcare be measured? The Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale™.
Lown BA; Muncer SJ; Chadwick R
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Aug; 98(8):1005-10. PubMed ID: 25921380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Modification and psychometric evaluation of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ
Kavaliauskienė A; Šidlauskas A; Zaborskis A
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 30611272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A brief psychometric and clinimetric evaluation of self-report burden and mental health measures completed by care partners of people with Parkinson's-related dementia.
Vatter S; McDonald KR; Stanmore E; McCormick SA; Clare L; Leroi I
Int Psychogeriatr; 2020 Jul; 32(7):875-880. PubMed ID: 32744494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Work-Health-Check (WHC): a brief new tool for assessing psychosocial stress in the workplace.
Gadinger MC; Schilling O; Litaker D; Fischer JE
Work; 2012; 43(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 22927585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population*.
Huang IC; Wu AW; Frangakis C
Qual Life Res; 2006 Feb; 15(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 16411027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Psychometric Evaluation of a Korean Version of the Cancer Survivors' Self-efficacy Scale.
Kim SH; Lee BG; Lee JY; Kim SJ; Hur MH; Lee MH; Han MS
Cancer Nurs; 2019; 42(6):509-514. PubMed ID: 30601268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Health-related quality of life in Iranian adolescents: a psychometric evaluation of the self-report form of the PedsQL 4.0 and an investigation of gender and age differences.
Hadianfard H; Kiani B; Azizzadeh Herozi M; Mohajelin F; Mitchell JT
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 33771186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quality of life impact of urge incontinence in older persons: a new measure and conceptual structure.
DuBeau CE; Kiely DK; Resnick NM
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1999 Aug; 47(8):989-94. PubMed ID: 10443861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The modified patient enablement instrument: a Portuguese cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study.
Remelhe M; Teixeira PM; Lopes I; Silva L; Correia de Sousa J
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med; 2017 Jan; 27():16087. PubMed ID: 28079863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
