150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25767938)
21. Application of stereoscopic visualization on surgical skill acquisition in novices.
Mistry M; Roach VA; Wilson TD
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 24016365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.
Smith R; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
Surg Endosc; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1522-7. PubMed ID: 22234585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic skills in novices using two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems: A randomized control study.
Abdelrahman M; Belramman A; Salem R; Patel B
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():333-338. PubMed ID: 29656132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model.
Schoenthaler M; Schnell D; Wilhelm K; Schlager D; Adams F; Hein S; Wetterauer U; Miernik A
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26242728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A study of the visual symptoms in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy.
El Boghdady M; Ramakrishnan G; Alijani A
Am J Surg; 2018 Dec; 216(6):1114-1117. PubMed ID: 30093093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.
Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills.
Cicione A; Autorino R; Breda A; De Sio M; Damiano R; Fusco F; Greco F; Carvalho-Dias E; Mota P; Nogueira C; Pinho P; Mirone V; Correia-Pinto J; Rassweiler J; Lima E
Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1444-50. PubMed ID: 24094658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [3D Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulation in Surgical Education - Results of a Pilot Study].
Kneist W; Huber T; Paschold M; Lang H
Zentralbl Chir; 2016 Jun; 141(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 23918724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.
Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons.
Mashiach R; Mezhybovsky V; Nevler A; Gutman M; Ziv A; Khaikin M
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3489-93. PubMed ID: 24962860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.
Velayutham V; Fuks D; Nomi T; Kawaguchi Y; Gayet B
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jan; 30(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 25805241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying.
Chang OH; King LP; Modest AM; Hur HC
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 26597729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Feb; 402(1):167-171. PubMed ID: 27761712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intracorporal knot tying techniques - which is the right one?
Romero P; Nickel F; Mantel M; Frongia G; Rossler A; Kowalewski KF; Müller-Stich BP; Günther P
J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Apr; 52(4):633-638. PubMed ID: 28017412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students.
Zwimpfer TA; Lacher D; Fellmann-Fischer B; Mueller M
BMC Surg; 2020 Nov; 20(1):276. PubMed ID: 33167972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy: evaluation of physicians' performance and preference using a pelvic trainer.
Ko JK; Li RH; Cheung VY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 25461685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
