These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
735 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25768986)
1. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration. Liu X; Wang Y; Waite TD; Leslie G Water Res; 2015 May; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rheology of sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor. Pollice A; Giordano C; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G Environ Technol; 2006 Jul; 27(7):723-32. PubMed ID: 16894816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Side-stream membrane bioreactors: Influence of stress generated by hydrodynamics on floc structure, supernatant quality and fouling propensity. Stricot M; Filali A; Lesage N; Spérandio M; Cabassud C Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2113-24. PubMed ID: 20060557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical and experimental investigation of pulse bubble aeration with high packing density hollow-fibre MBRs. Radaei E; Liu X; Tng KH; Merendino G; Trujillo FJ; Bérubé PR; Leslie G Water Res; 2019 Sep; 160():60-69. PubMed ID: 31132563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of sludge viscosity and its effects on the performance of a vacuum rotation membrane bioreactor. Komesli OT; Gökçay CF Environ Technol; 2014; 35(5-8):645-52. PubMed ID: 24645444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation. Brannock M; Wang Y; Leslie G Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3181-91. PubMed ID: 20347471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge. Ratkovich N; Chan CC; Bentzen TR; Rasmussen MR Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):2061-70. PubMed ID: 22592479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence of microbubble and its generation process on mixed liquor properties of activated sludge]. Liu C; Ma J; Zhang L; Zhang J; Zhang M; Wu G Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jan; 34(1):198-203. PubMed ID: 23487939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical and numerical modelling of Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquid in a rotational cross-flow MBR. Bentzen TR; Ratkovich N; Madsen S; Jensen JC; Bak SN; Rasmussen MR Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(11):2318-27. PubMed ID: 23032760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of mixed liquor properties and aeration intensity on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor at high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations. Trussell RS; Merlo RP; Hermanowicz SW; Jenkins D Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 17239918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of MBR hydrodynamics for cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM design. Yang M; Yu D; Liu M; Zheng L; Zheng X; Wei Y; Wang F; Fan Y Bioresour Technol; 2017 Mar; 227():102-111. PubMed ID: 28013126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical characteristics of the sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor. Pollice A; Giordano C; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1832-40. PubMed ID: 17324447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superior performance of a membrane bioreactor through innovative in-situ aeration and structural optimization using computational fluid dynamics. Shen L; Wu Q; Ye Q; Lin H; Zhang J; Chen C; Yue R; Teng J; Hong H; Liao BQ Water Res; 2023 Sep; 243():120353. PubMed ID: 37482001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrodynamic effects of air sparging on hollow fiber membranes in a bubble column reactor. Xia L; Law AW; Fane AG Water Res; 2013 Jul; 47(11):3762-72. PubMed ID: 23726713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of temperature shocks on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. van den Brink P; Satpradit OA; van Bentem A; Zwijnenburg A; Temmink H; van Loosdrecht M Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(15):4491-500. PubMed ID: 21764418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CFD simulation and optimization of membrane scouring and nitrogen removal for an airlift external circulation membrane bioreactor. Yang M; Wei Y; Zheng X; Wang F; Yuan X; Liu J; Luo N; Xu R; Yu D; Fan Y Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 219():566-575. PubMed ID: 27540633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of solid retention time on the rheology of MBR sludge. Giordano C; Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):151-9. PubMed ID: 17978443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times. Laera G; Giordano C; Pollice A; Saturno D; Mininni G Water Res; 2007 Oct; 41(18):4197-203. PubMed ID: 17619046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clogging vs. fouling in immersed membrane bioreactors. Buzatu P; Qiblawey H; Odai A; Jamaleddin J; Nasser M; Judd SJ Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():46-54. PubMed ID: 30014978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]