282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25769671)
1. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
Miklos JR; Moore RD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
Hanes CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice].
Wagner L; Meurette G; Vidart A; Warembourg S; Terassa JB; Berrogain N; Ragni E; Le Normand L
Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S27-37. PubMed ID: 27595624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
J Endourol; 2018 May; 32(S1):S111-S116. PubMed ID: 29774820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy related to body mass index.
McDermott CD; Park J; Terry CL; Woodman PJ; Hale DS
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 22260763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apical prolapse.
Barber MD; Maher C
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1815-33. PubMed ID: 24142057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy.
Chen Y; Li J; Zhang Y; Hua K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 29107118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.
To V; Hengrasmee P; Lam A; Luscombe G; Lawless A; Lam J
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1825-1832. PubMed ID: 28620794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.
Chan SS; Pang SM; Cheung TH; Cheung RY; Chung TK
Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21282827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
Parkes IL; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive literature review on current practice.
Gluck O; Blaganje M; Veit-Rubin N; Phillips C; Deprest J; O'reilly B; But I; Moore R; Jeffery S; Haddad JM; Deval B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Feb; 245():94-101. PubMed ID: 31891897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
