129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25769743)
1. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon Series Reported at a Minimum of 10 Years Follow-Up.
Mehra A; Berryman F; Matharu GS; Pynsent PB; Isbister ES
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25769743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The outcome and survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients aged less than 50 years: a prospective observational cohort study with minimum ten-year follow-up.
Scholes CJ; Ebrahimi M; Farah SB; Field C; Cordingley R; Kerr D; Kohan L
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 30601056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years.
Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively.
Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience.
Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.
Uemura K; Takao M; Hamada H; Sakai T; Ohzono K; Sugano N
J Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 21(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28856453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of the First U.S. FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device at 10-Year Follow-up.
Su EP; Ho H; Bhal V; Housman LR; Masonis JL; Noble JW; Hopper RH; Engh CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(14):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33999875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.
Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.
Steffen RT; Pandit HP; Palan J; Beard DJ; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 18378915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure.
Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midterm results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: a single-surgeon series.
Lass R; Bechler U; Springer B; Rueckl K; Hanreich C; Boettner F
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Feb; 143(2):1041-1048. PubMed ID: 35076766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States.
Nam D; Nunley RM; Ruh EL; Engh CA; Rogerson JS; Brooks PJ; Raterman SJ; Su EP; Barrack RL
Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21. PubMed ID: 26270759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
