These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25769743)

  • 21. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
    Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older.
    Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
    Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing.
    McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is there a new learning curve with transition to a new resurfacing system?
    Johnson AJ; Costa CR; Naziri Q; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S16-9. PubMed ID: 22035479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
    Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP
    Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
    Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips.
    Canadian Arthroplasty Society
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon.
    Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up.
    Pailhe R; Matharu GS; Sharma A; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
    Int Orthop; 2014 Jun; 38(6):1139-45. PubMed ID: 24370976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis - a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Bourget-Murray J; Watt Kearns SJ; Piroozfar S; Lukenchuk J; Johnston K; Werle J
    Can J Surg; 2022; 65(3):E296-E302. PubMed ID: 35504661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre.
    Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G
    Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-Term Outcomes After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28-mm Head: A 17- to 23-Year Follow-Up Study of a Previous Report.
    Moon JK; Kim Y; Hwang KT; Yang JH; Oh YH; Kim YH
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2165-2172. PubMed ID: 29656971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
    Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term survivorship of the Corail™ standard stem.
    Louboutin L; Viste A; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 103(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 28778624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimum 5-year follow-up after Cormet hip resurfacing. A single surgeon series of 234 hips.
    Kordás G; Baxter J; Parsons N; Costa ML; Krikler SJ
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22505179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.