These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25770285)

  • 1. From group data to useful probabilities: the relevance of actuarial risk assessment in individual instances.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 25770285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using base rates and correlational data to supplement clinical risk assessments.
    Davis J; Sorensen JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 24051592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The precarious practice of forensic psychiatric risk assessments.
    Nilsson T; Munthe C; Gustavson C; Forsman A; Anckarsäter H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 19800123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of violence risk assessment.
    Monahan J; Skeem JL
    CNS Spectr; 2014 Oct; 19(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 24679593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Validity of risk calculations in offenders -- criticism of a basic methodological assumption, and future perspectives].
    Urbaniok F
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2004 May; 72(5):260-9. PubMed ID: 15136947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Hart SD; Cooke DJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 23322617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.
    Sreenivasan S; Kirkish P; Garrick T; Weinberger LE; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 11196254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 22667813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The short- to medium-term predictive accuracy of static and dynamic risk assessment measures in a secure forensic hospital.
    Chu CM; Thomas SD; Ogloff JR; Daffern M
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 21856718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for violent behavior in outpatient forensic psychiatric patients.
    Troquete NA; van den Brink RH; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 25496088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Schizophrenia and violence].
    Boudriot F; Guldimann A; Habermeyer E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2013 Dec; 103(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 24393820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innumeracy and unpacking: bridging the nomothetic/idiographic divide in violence risk assessment.
    Scurich N; Monahan J; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 22545583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to assess and investigate a patient within a forensic psychiatry setting.
    Moore E
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S37-42. PubMed ID: 16575814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ramesh T; Igoumenou A; Vazquez Montes M; Fazel S
    Eur Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 52():47-53. PubMed ID: 29626758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can violent (re)offense be predicted? Review of the role of the clinician and use of actuarial tests in light of new data.
    Zagar RJ; Busch KG; Grove WM; Hughes JR
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Feb; 104(1):247-77. PubMed ID: 19480216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An examination of violence risk communication in practice using a structured professional judgment framework.
    Storey JE; Watt KA; Hart SD
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 25615811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools.
    Steadman HJ; Silver E; Monahan J; Appelbaum PS; Robbins PC; Mulvey EP; Grisso T; Roth LH; Banks S
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 10693320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specialist forensic mental health services.
    Davison S
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S19-24. PubMed ID: 16575811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.