These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Anatomy of an error: a bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Allan Cheyne J; Solman GJ; Carriere JS; Smilek D Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):98-113. PubMed ID: 19215913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART). Whyte J; Grieb-Neff P; Gantz C; Polansky M Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):2007-14. PubMed ID: 16682059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Stawarczyk D; Majerus S; Maj M; Van der Linden M; D'Argembeau A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 21349473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Age trends for failures of sustained attention. Carriere JS; Cheyne JA; Solman GJ; Smilek D Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 20677878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigating sustained attention ability in the elderly by using two different approaches: inhibiting ongoing behavior versus responding on rare occasions. Staub B; Doignon-Camus N; Bacon E; Bonnefond A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():51-7. PubMed ID: 24378237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Response inhibition toward alcohol-related cues using an alcohol go/no-go task in problem and non-problem drinkers. Kreusch F; Vilenne A; Quertemont E Addict Behav; 2013 Oct; 38(10):2520-8. PubMed ID: 23773960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective. Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):509-518. PubMed ID: 35403969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Chewing gum benefits sustained attention in the absence of task degradation. Johnson AJ; Muneem M; Miles C Nutr Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 16(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 23321011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention. Head J; Helton WS Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1617-25. PubMed ID: 23000831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biofeedback-based self-alert training reduces alpha activity and stabilizes accuracy in the Sustained Attention to Response Task. Braun N; Debener S; Sölle A; Kranczioch C; Hildebrandt H J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2015; 37(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 25658671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Challenge and error: critical events and attention-related errors. Cheyne JA; Carriere JS; Solman GJ; Smilek D Cognition; 2011 Dec; 121(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 21861999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. When the mind wanders: age-related differences between young and older adults. Zavagnin M; Borella E; De Beni R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():54-64. PubMed ID: 24291121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A methodological note on evaluating performance in a sustained-attention-to-response task. Seli P; Jonker TR; Solman GJ; Cheyne JA; Smilek D Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 23055171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]