252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25770846)
1. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape.
Marjolein Bij de Vaate AJ; Linskens IH; van der Voet LF; Twisk JW; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():39-44. PubMed ID: 25770846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth.
Banerjee A; Al-Dabbach Z; Bredaki FE; Casagrandi D; Tetteh A; Greenwold N; Ivan M; Jurkovic D; David AL; Napolitano R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 35809243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.
Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement.
Baranov A; Gunnarsson G; Salvesen KÅ; Isberg PE; Vikhareva O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 25720922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies.
Salim R; Woelfer B; Backos M; Regan L; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 12808675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15959922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement.
Farrell T; Cairns M; Leslie J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 12858303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding.
van der Voet LF; Bij de Vaate AM; Veersema S; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 24373597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in the Uterine Scar during the First Year after a Caesarean Section: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
van der Voet LF; Jordans IPM; Brölmann HAM; Veersema S; Huirne JAF
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 28957798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter- and intraobserver variability in three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the endometrial-myometrial junction and factors affecting its visualization.
Naftalin J; Hoo W; Nunes N; Mavrelos D; Nicks H; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 22045594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
