These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25770846)

  • 1. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape.
    Marjolein Bij de Vaate AJ; Linskens IH; van der Voet LF; Twisk JW; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():39-44. PubMed ID: 25770846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth.
    Banerjee A; Al-Dabbach Z; Bredaki FE; Casagrandi D; Tetteh A; Greenwold N; Ivan M; Jurkovic D; David AL; Napolitano R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 35809243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.
    Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
    Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement.
    Baranov A; Gunnarsson G; Salvesen KÅ; Isberg PE; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 25720922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
    Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
    Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies.
    Salim R; Woelfer B; Backos M; Regan L; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 12808675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
    Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women.
    Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15959922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
    Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement.
    Farrell T; Cairns M; Leslie J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 12858303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding.
    van der Voet LF; Bij de Vaate AM; Veersema S; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 24373597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in the Uterine Scar during the First Year after a Caesarean Section: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    van der Voet LF; Jordans IPM; Brölmann HAM; Veersema S; Huirne JAF
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 28957798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter- and intraobserver variability in three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the endometrial-myometrial junction and factors affecting its visualization.
    Naftalin J; Hoo W; Nunes N; Mavrelos D; Nicks H; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 22045594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.