These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25771055)

  • 21. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of the Illumina Bovine3K BeadChip in dairy genomic evaluation.
    Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Vanraden PM; Olson KM; Tooker ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22365235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions.
    Judge MM; Purfield DC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1489-1501. PubMed ID: 28464096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short communication: relationship of call rate and accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in dairy cattle.
    Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3336-9. PubMed ID: 23497995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes.
    VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Sargolzaei M; Wiggans GR; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Sonstegard TS; Connor EE; Winters M; van Kaam JB; Valentini A; Van Doormaal BJ; Faust MA; Doak GA
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):668-78. PubMed ID: 23063157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Confirmation and discovery of maternal grandsires and great-grandsires in dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; O'Connell JR; Bacheller LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1874-9. PubMed ID: 23332849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
    Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
    Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short communication: imputing genotypes using PedImpute fast algorithm combining pedigree and population information.
    Nicolazzi EL; Biffani S; Jansen G
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2649-2653. PubMed ID: 23462161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imputation of genotypes from different single nucleotide polymorphism panels in dairy cattle.
    Druet T; Schrooten C; de Roos AP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5443-54. PubMed ID: 20965360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle.
    Zhang Z; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5487-94. PubMed ID: 20965364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.