414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25771132)
21. Imaging gently? Higher rates of computed tomography imaging for pediatric appendicitis in non-children's hospitals.
Anderson KT; Putnam LR; Caldwell KM; B Diffley M; A Hildebrandt A; Covey SE; Austin MT; Kawaguchi AL; Lally KP; Tsao K
Surgery; 2017 May; 161(5):1326-1333. PubMed ID: 27919452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Trends in diagnostic approaches for pediatric appendicitis: nationwide population-based study.
Luo CC; Chien WK; Huang CS; Lo HC; Wu SM; Huang HC; Chen RJ; Chao HC
BMC Pediatr; 2017 Nov; 17(1):188. PubMed ID: 29100501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children.
Martin AE; Vollman D; Adler B; Caniano DA
J Pediatr Surg; 2004 Jun; 39(6):886-90; discussion 886-90. PubMed ID: 15185219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of body mass index on the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in diagnosing appendicitis in children.
Abo A; Shannon M; Taylor G; Bachur R
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2011 Aug; 27(8):731-6. PubMed ID: 21811194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An evidence-based clinical protocol for diagnosis of acute appendicitis decreased the use of computed tomography in children.
Adibe OO; Amin SR; Hansen EN; Chong AJ; Perger L; Keijzer R; Muensterer OJ; Georgeson KE; Harmon CM
J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):192-6. PubMed ID: 21238665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.
Garcia Peña BM; Cook EF; Mandl KD
Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):24-8. PubMed ID: 14702442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.
Stephen AE; Segev DL; Ryan DP; Mullins ME; Kim SH; Schnitzer JJ; Doody DP
J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. PubMed ID: 12632351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computerized tomography in the workup of pediatric appendicitis: why are children scanned?
Ladd MR; Neff LP; Becher RD; Gallaher JR; Pranikoff T
Am Surg; 2012 Jun; 78(6):716-21. PubMed ID: 22643271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical outcomes in obese and normal-weight children undergoing ultrasound for suspected appendicitis.
Sulowski C; Doria AS; Langer JC; Man C; Stephens D; Schuh S
Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 18(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 21314776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computerized tomography utilization in children with appendicitis-differences in referring and children's hospitals.
Neff LP; Ladd MR; Becher RD; Jordanhazy RA; Gallaher JR; Pranikoff T
Am Surg; 2011 Aug; 77(8):1061-5. PubMed ID: 21944524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective.
Raja AS; Wright C; Sodickson AD; Zane RD; Schiff GD; Hanson R; Baeyens PF; Khorasani R
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):460-5. PubMed ID: 20529988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Fewer unnecessary appendectomies following ultrasonography and CT].
Leeuwenburgh MM; Bakker OJ; Gorzeman MP; Bollen TL; Seldenrijk CA; Go PM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A869. PubMed ID: 20456809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation.
Kosloske AM; Love CL; Rohrer JE; Goldthorn JF; Lacey SR
Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14702443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A simple algorithm reduces computed tomography use in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.
Polites SF; Mohamed MI; Habermann EB; Homme JL; Anderson JL; Moir CR; Ishitani MB; Zarroug AE
Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):448-54. PubMed ID: 24953265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality.
Hernandez JA; Swischuk LE; Angel CA; Chung D; Chandler R; Lee S
Pediatr Radiol; 2005 Apr; 35(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 15635471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic imaging and negative appendectomy rates in children: effects of age and gender.
Bachur RG; Hennelly K; Callahan MJ; Chen C; Monuteaux MC
Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):877-84. PubMed ID: 22508920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children.
Applegate KE; Sivit CJ; Salvator AE; Borisa VJ; Dudgeon DL; Stallion AE; Grisoni ER
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 11425980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving imaging strategies in pediatric appendicitis: a quality improvement initiative.
Schoel L; Maizlin II; Koppelmann T; Onwubiko C; Shroyer M; Douglas A; Russell RT
J Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 230():131-136. PubMed ID: 30100029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic imaging for acute appendicitis: interfacility differences in practice patterns.
Michailidou M; Sacco Casamassima MG; Karim O; Gause C; Salazar JH; Goldstein SD; Abdullah F
Pediatr Surg Int; 2015 Apr; 31(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 25700686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
Johansson EP; Rydh A; Riklund KA
Acta Radiol; 2007 Apr; 48(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 17453494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
