These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25772102)

  • 1. Interdependent processing and encoding of speech and concurrent background noise.
    Cooper A; Brouwer S; Bradlow AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1342-57. PubMed ID: 25772102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
    Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition.
    McLennan CT; Luce PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):306-21. PubMed ID: 15755247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.
    Lam BPW; Xie Z; Tessmer R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6):1662-1673. PubMed ID: 28586824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Background Suppression and its Relation to Foreground Processing of Speech Versus Non-speech Streams.
    Zhang X; Li X; Chen J; Gong Q
    Neuroscience; 2018 Mar; 373():60-71. PubMed ID: 29337239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Talker Familiarity in Auditory Distraction.
    Barker BA; Elliott EM
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30777512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.
    White-Schwoch T; Davies EC; Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():34-47. PubMed ID: 26113025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of Native English Reduced Forms in Adverse Environments by Chinese Undergraduate Students.
    Wong SWL; Tsui JKY; Chow BW; Leung VWH; Mok P; Chung KK
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1149-1165. PubMed ID: 28365876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-accent intelligibility of speech in noise: long-term familiarity and short-term familiarization.
    Smith R; Holmes-Elliott S; Pettinato M; Knight RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):590-608. PubMed ID: 23972232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilingual listeners' perception of temporally manipulated English passages.
    Shi LF; Farooq N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 22199197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception.
    Green KP; Tomiak GR; Kuhl PK
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jul; 59(5):675-92. PubMed ID: 9259636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.