BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25772958)

  • 1. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.
    Palmer EJ; Devitt PG
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 7():49. PubMed ID: 18045500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and short essay questions.
    Oyebola DD; Adewoye OE; Iyaniwura JO; Alada AR; Fasanmade AA; Raji Y
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2000; 29(3-4):201-5. PubMed ID: 11713989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the educational impact of cognitive level of MCQ and SEQ on learning approaches of dental students.
    Arooj M; Mukhtar K; Khan RA; Azhar T
    Pak J Med Sci; 2021; 37(2):445-449. PubMed ID: 33679929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS stage I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus).
    Pepple DJ; Young LE; Carroll RG
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 20522902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound Practices: An Exploratory Study of Building and Monitoring Multiple-Choice Exams at Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Programs.
    St-Onge C; Young M; Renaud JS; Cummings BA; Drescher O; Varpio L
    Acad Med; 2021 Feb; 96(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 32769474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer assisted versus expert assisted learning: a comparison of effectiveness in terms of academic scores.
    Riaz I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Nov; 24(11):825-9. PubMed ID: 25404441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot experiment on the inter-examiner reliability of short essay questions.
    Wakeford RE; Roberts S
    Med Educ; 1979 Sep; 13(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 522685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative assessment of multiple choice questions versus short essay questions in pharmacology examinations.
    Mujeeb AM; Pardeshi ML; Ghongane BB
    Indian J Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 64(3):118-24. PubMed ID: 22569324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
    Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.