These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25772958)

  • 21. Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    Kulshreshtha S; Gupta G; Goyal G; Gupta K; Davda K
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Jun; 74(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 38974743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Assessments and Their Parameters as Predictors of Academic Performance in Undergraduate Medical Education.
    Mohanraj PS; Das A; Rajendran V; Gopal N; Saravanan K; Balan Y
    Cureus; 2024 Jun; 16(6):e62129. PubMed ID: 38993421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Multiple-Choice Questions for Pharmacy Assessment.
    Leslie T; Gierl MJ
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2023 Oct; 87(10):100081. PubMed ID: 37852684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Examining the impact of specific types of item-writing flaws on student performance and psychometric properties of the multiple choice question.
    Pham H; Besanko J; Devitt P
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():225. PubMed ID: 38089249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blueprinting of summative theory assessment of undergraduate medical students in microbiology.
    Gill JS; Sen S
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2020 Apr; 76(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 32476720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Problem-solving strategies used in anatomical multiple-choice questions.
    Kolomitro K; MacKenzie LW; Lockridge M; Clohosey D
    Health Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 3(4):e209. PubMed ID: 33305012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of Higher Ordered Thinking in Medical Education: Multiple Choice Questions and Modified Essay Questions.
    Javaeed A
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():128. PubMed ID: 38074575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.
    Sajjad M; Iltaf S; Khan RA
    Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(5):982-986. PubMed ID: 32704275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The equation for medical multiple-choice question testing time estimation.
    Kreepala C; Keeratibharat N; Aekgawong S; Wattanavaekin K; Danjittrong T; Juntararuangtong T; Chombandit T
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2024 May; 86(5):2688-2695. PubMed ID: 38694350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Back to basics: reflective take on role of MCQs in undergraduate Malaysian dental professional qualifying exams.
    Rath A
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1287924. PubMed ID: 38098841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of mini-essay questions (MEQ) and multiple choice questions (MCQ) as a tool for assessing the cognitive skills of undergraduate students at the Department of Medicine.
    Moeen-Uz-Zafar ; Badr-Aljarallah
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2011 Jul; 5(2 Suppl 1):43-4. PubMed ID: 23284579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study.
    Abdulghani HM; Sattar K; Ahmad T; Akram A; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249319. PubMed ID: 33780493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the educational impact of cognitive level of MCQ and SEQ on learning approaches of dental students.
    Arooj M; Mukhtar K; Khan RA; Azhar T
    Pak J Med Sci; 2021; 37(2):445-449. PubMed ID: 33679929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of performance on written and OSCE assessment during end semester pediatric examination.
    Memon S; Shaikh SU
    Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(4):711-716. PubMed ID: 32494261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Comparison Between Written Assessment Methods: Multiple-choice and Short Answer Questions in End-of-clerkship Examinations for Final Year Medical Students.
    Farooqui F; Saeed N; Aaraj S; Sami MA; Amir M
    Cureus; 2018 Dec; 10(12):e3773. PubMed ID: 30820392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.
    Palmer EJ; Devitt PG
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 7():49. PubMed ID: 18045500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.