These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25773314)
1. Prediction of true test scores from observed item scores and ancillary data. Haberman SJ; Yao L; Sinharay S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):363-85. PubMed ID: 25773314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown. Köhn HF; Chiu CY; Brusco MJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):268-91. PubMed ID: 25496248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of using a scoring guide on essay scores: generalizability theory. Kan A Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):891-905. PubMed ID: 18229543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linking essay-writing tests using many-facet models and neural automated essay scoring. Uto M; Aramaki K Behav Res Methods; 2024 Dec; 56(8):8450-8479. PubMed ID: 39164563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education. Gierl MJ; Latifi S; Lai H; Boulais AP; De Champlain A Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):950-62. PubMed ID: 25200016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Downing SM Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model. Taherbhai HM; Young MJ J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Writing Evaluation: Rater and Task Effects on the Reliability of Writing Scores for Children in Grades 3 and 4. Kim GY; Schatschneider C; Wanzek J; Gatlin B; Al Otaiba S Read Writ; 2017 Jun; 30(6):1287-1310. PubMed ID: 29075050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model. Chi E J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Repeated Exposure to Items. O'Neill TR; Sun L; Peabody MR; Royal KD Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26507998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: an example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English. Elder C; McNamara T; Congdon P J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12748409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity. Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design. Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. All prompts are created equal, but some prompts are more equal than others. Shermis MD; Rasmussen JL; Rajecki DW; Olson J; Marsiglio C J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(2):154-70. PubMed ID: 12021476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Facets Analysis of Analytic vs. Holistic Scoring of Identical Short Constructed-Response Items: Different Outcomes and Their Implications for Scoring Rubric Development. Curcin M; Sweiry E J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(3):228-246. PubMed ID: 29579737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The second time around: accounting for retest effects on oral examinations. Raymond MR; Luciw-Dubas UA Eval Health Prof; 2010 Sep; 33(3):386-403. PubMed ID: 20801978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the Performance of Second Language Medical Students on Lengthy Clinical Vignettes. Raymond MR; Ling Y; Grabovsky I Eval Health Prof; 2017 Jun; 40(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 27760879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. Glas CA; van der Linden WJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model. Kim SC; Wilson M J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does subgroup membership information lead to better estimation of true subscores? Haberman SJ; Sinharay S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):452-69. PubMed ID: 23106170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]